Abstract:Although Artificial Intelligence can offer significant business benefits, many consumers have negative perceptions of AI, leading to negative reactions when companies act ethically and disclose its use. Based on the pervasive example of content creation (e.g., via tools like ChatGPT), this research examines the potential for human-AI collaboration to preserve consumers' message credibility judgments and attitudes towards the company. The study compares two distinct forms of human-AI collaboration, namely AI-supported human authorship and human-controlled AI authorship, with traditional human authorship or full automation. Building on the compensatory control theory and the algorithm aversion concept, the study evaluates whether disclosing a high human input share (without explicit control) or human control over AI (with lower human input share) can mitigate negative consumer reactions. Moreover, this paper investigates the moderating role of consumers' perceived morality of companies' AI use. Results from two experiments in different contexts reveal that human-AI collaboration can alleviate negative consumer responses, but only when the collaboration indicates human control over AI. Furthermore, the effects of content authorship depend on consumers' moral acceptance of a company's AI use. AI authorship forms without human control lead to more negative consumer responses in case of low perceived morality (and no effects in case of high morality), whereas messages from AI with human control were not perceived differently to human authorship, irrespective of the morality level. These findings provide guidance for managers on how to effectively integrate human-AI collaboration into consumer-facing applications and advises to take consumers' ethical concerns into account.

How to Talk When a Machine Is Listening: Corporate Disclosure in the Age of AI

From Man vs. Machine to Man + Machine: The Art and AI of Stock Analyses

The effect of source disclosure on evaluation of AI-generated messages: A two-part study

Does Investor Communication Improve Corporate Social Responsibility? A Machine Learning-Based Textual Analysis

To disclose or not disclose, is no longer the question – effect of AI-disclosed brand voice on brand authenticity and attitude

Do You Mind if I Ask You a Personal Question? How AI Service Agents Alter Consumer Self-Disclosure

Algorithm aversion, emotions, and investor reaction: Does disclosing the use of AI influence investment decisions?

Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases

Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships

Consumer responses to human-AI collaboration at organizational frontlines: strategies to escape algorithm aversion in content creation

How Does the Disclosure of AI Assistance Affect the Perceptions of Writing?

When AI-based services fail: examining the effect of the self-AI connection on willingness to share negative word-of-mouth after service failures

Art-ificial Intelligence: The Effect of AI Disclosure on Evaluations of Creative Content

“Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond?

Does management tone matter in information disclosure? Evidence from IPO online roadshows in the SSE STAR market

Promoting or inhibiting: The impact of artificial intelligence application on corporate environmental performance

When the Use of Positive Language Backfires: The Joint Effect of Tone, Readability, and Investor Sophistication on Earnings Judgments

Removing AI’s Sentiment Manipulation of Personalized News Delivery

Discretionary Disclosure on Twitter

When Artificial Intelligence Voices Human Concerns: the Paradoxical Effects of AI Voice on Climate Risk Perception and Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention

The Dissemination of Politically-Motivated False Information and Its Influence on the Stock Market