Abstract:Background: Violent attacks on and interferences with hospitals, ambulances, health workers, and patients during conflict destroy vital health services during a time when they are most needed and undermine the long-term capacity of the health system. In Syria, such attacks have been frequent and intense and represent grave violations of the Geneva Conventions, but the number reported has varied considerably. A systematic mechanism to document these attacks could assist in designing more protection strategies and play a critical role in influencing policy, promoting justice, and addressing the health needs of the population. Methods and findings: We developed a mobile data collection questionnaire to collect data on incidents of attacks on healthcare directly from the field. Data collectors from the Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS), using the tool or a text messaging system, recorded information on incidents across four of Syria's northern governorates (Aleppo, Idleb, Hama, and Homs) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. SAMS recorded a total of 200 attacks on healthcare in 2016, 102 of them using the mobile data collection tool. Direct attacks on health facilities comprised the majority of attacks recorded (88.0%; n = 176). One hundred and twelve healthcare staff and 185 patients were killed in these incidents. Thirty-five percent of the facilities were attacked more than once over the data collection period; hospitals were significantly more likely to be attacked more than once compared to clinics and other types of healthcare facilities. Aerial bombs were used in the overwhelming majority of cases (91.5%). We also compared the SAMS data to a separate database developed by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) based on media reports and matched the incidents to compare the results from the two methods (this analysis was limited to incidents at health facilities). Among 90 relevant incidents verified by PHR and 177 by SAMS, there were 60 that could be matched to each other, highlighting the differences in results from the two methods. This study is limited by the complexities of data collection in a conflict setting, only partial use of the standardized reporting tool, and the fact that limited accessibility of some health facilities and workers and may be biased towards the reporting of attacks on larger or more visible health facilities. Conclusions: The use of field data collectors and use of consistent definitions can play an important role in the tracking incidents of attacks on health services. A mobile systematic data collection tool can complement other methods for tracking incidents of attacks on healthcare and ensure the collection of detailed information about each attack that may assist in better advocacy, programs, and accountability but can be practically challenging. Comparing attacks between SAMS and PHR suggests that there may have been significantly more attacks than previously captured by any one methodology. This scale of attacks suggests that targeting of healthcare in Syria is systematic and highlights the failure of condemnation by the international community and medical groups working in Syria of such attacks to stop them.

Lebanon's health system struggles as dozens of clinics close amid Israeli airstrikes

The global health community must act to protect Lebanon's healthcare system

Gaza: Just one working hospital remains in Rafah, as healthcare worker death toll reaches 500

Gaza: "No health system left," says MSF

Violence against health staff in conflict zones reached record high in 2023

The Lebanese Healthcare Crisis: An Infinite Calamity

Healthcare delivery in Lebanon: a critical scoping review of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

Gaza: Over 22 000 people with life changing injuries urgently need rehabilitation, WHO warns

Quantifying the effects of attacks on health facilities on health service use in Northwest Syria: a case time series study from 2017 to 2019

The global health community must call for an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian aid in Gaza

Damage to medical complexes in the Israel–Hamas war: a geospatial analysis

Gaza: Doctors of the World office destroyed, as medics are forced to amputate without anaesthetic

Characteristics of injuries during the 2006 Lebanon conflict: a three-center retrospective study of survivors, 16 years after the conflict

Determining the scope of attacks on health in four governorates of Syria in 2016: Results of a field surveillance program

As sickness, hunger, and disease spread, Gaza’s health system faces increasing threats

Roadmap for rebuilding the health system and scenarios of crisis path in Gaza

Defending the right to health in Gaza: a call to action by health workers

Echoes of conflict: the enduring mental health struggle of Gaza's healthcare workers

MSF opens field hospital in Gaza

Ukraine: Nearly 2000 attacks on health facilities have been launched since invasion, says WHO

Rebuilding the health sector in Gaza: alternative humanitarian voices