Abstract:The largest US banks are required by regulatory mandate to estimate the operational risk capital they must hold using an Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) as defined by the Basel II/III Accords. Most use the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA) which defines the aggregate loss distribution as the convolution of a frequency and a severity distribution representing the number and magnitude of losses, respectively. Estimated capital is a Value-at-Risk (99.9th percentile) estimate of this annual loss distribution. In practice, the severity distribution drives the capital estimate, which is essentially a very high quantile of the estimated severity distribution. Unfortunately, because the relevant severities are heavy-tailed AND the quantiles being estimated are so high, VaR always appears to be a convex function of the severity parameters, causing all widely-used estimators to generate biased capital estimates (apparently) due to Jensen's Inequality. The observed capital inflation is sometimes enormous, even at the unit-of-measure (UoM) level (even billions USD). Herein I present an estimator of capital that essentially eliminates this upward bias. The Reduced-bias Capital Estimator (RCE) is more consistent with the regulatory intent of the LDA framework than implementations that fail to mitigate this bias. RCE also notably increases the precision of the capital estimate and consistently increases its robustness to violations of the i.i.d. data presumption (which are endemic to operational risk loss event data). So with greater capital accuracy, precision, and robustness, RCE lowers capital requirements at both the UoM and enterprise levels, increases capital stability from quarter to quarter, ceteris paribus, and does both while more accurately and precisely reflecting regulatory intent. RCE is straightforward to implement using any major statistical software package.

Estimation of Operational Risk Capital Charge under Parameter Uncertainty

Implementing Loss Distribution Approach for Operational Risk

The Quantification of Operational Risk using Internal Data, Relevant External Data and Expert Opinions

The Structural Modelling of Operational Risk via Bayesian inference: Combining Loss Data with Expert Opinions

Robust Estimation of Operational Risk

Estimating Operational Risk Capital with Greater Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness

Measuring the Capital Charge for Operational Risk of a Bank with the Large Deviation Approach

Loss Distribution Approach for Operational Risk Capital Modelling under Basel II: Combining Different Data Sources for Risk Estimation

Addressing the Impact of Data Truncation and Parameter Uncertainty on Operational Risk Estimates

Parameter uncertainty for integrated risk capital calculations based on normally distributed subrisks

A Combination Model for Operational Risk Estimation in A Chinese Banking Industry Case

Estimating Operational Risk of China's Commercial Bank via Improved Monte Carlo Simulation

Understanding Operational Risk Capital Approximations: First and Second Orders

On the Selection of Loss Severity Distributions to Model Operational Risk

A "Toy" Model for Operational Risk Quantification using Credibility Theory

Operational Risk Quantified with Spectral Risk Measures: a Refined Closed-Form Approximation

Operational risk estimation using system analysis methodology

Study On Operational Risk Management In Commercial Banks Based On Bayesian Networks

Operational Risk Management Based on Bayesian MCMC

A Bayesian Networks Approach to Operational Risk

The Calculus of Expected Loss: Backtesting Parameter-Based Expected Loss in a Basel II Framework