Abstract:Background: Patients and publics are generally positive about data-intensive health research. However, conditions need to be fulfilled for their support. Ensuring confidentiality, security, and privacy of patients' health data is pivotal. Patients and publics have concerns about secondary use of data by commercial parties and the risk of data misuse, reasons for which they favor personal control of their data. Yet, the potential of public benefit highlights the potential of building trust to attenuate these perceptions of harm and risk. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on how conditions for support of data-intensive health research can be operationalized to that end remains scant. Objective: This study aims to inform efforts to design governance frameworks for data-intensive health research, by gaining insight into the preferences of patients and publics for governance policies and measures. Methods: We distributed a digital questionnaire among a purposive sample of patients and publics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric inferential statistics to compare group differences and explore associations between policy preferences. Results: Study participants (N=987) strongly favored sharing their health data for scientific health research. Personal decision-making about which research projects health data are shared with (346/980, 35.3%), which researchers/organizations can have access (380/978, 38.9%), and the provision of information (458/981, 46.7%) were found highly important. Health data-sharing policies strengthening direct personal control, like being able to decide under which conditions health data are shared (538/969, 55.5%), were found highly important. Policies strengthening collective governance, like reliability checks (805/967, 83.2%) and security safeguards (787/976, 80.6%), were also found highly important. Further analysis revealed that participants willing to share health data, to a lesser extent, demanded policies strengthening direct personal control than participants who were reluctant to share health data. This was the case for the option to have health data deleted at any time (P<.001) and the ability to decide the conditions under which health data can be shared (P<.001). Overall, policies and measures enforcing conditions for support at the collective level of governance, like having an independent committee to evaluate requests for access to health data (P=.02), were most strongly favored. This also applied to participants who explicitly stressed that it was important to be able to decide the conditions under which health data can be shared, for instance, whether sanctions on data misuse are in place (P=.03). Conclusions: This study revealed that both a positive attitude toward health data sharing and demand for personal decision-making abilities were associated with policies and measures strengthening control at the collective level of governance. We recommend pursuing the development of this type of governance policy. More importantly, further study is required to understand how governance policies and measures can contribute to the trustworthiness of data-intensive health research.

Data stewardship in FTLD research: Investigator and research participant views

Gathering the Stakeholder's Perspective: Experiences and Opportunities in Rare Genetic Disease Research

We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era

Gaps in biomedical research in frontotemporal dementia: A call for diversity and disparities focused research

Privacy, ethics, and data access: A case study of the Fragile Families Challenge

Data sharing and re-use in the traumatic stress field: An international survey of trauma researchers

The pursuit of approaches to federate data to accelerate Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research: GAAIN, DPUK, and ADDI

Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository

Maximizing the Utility of Alzheimer's Disease Trial Data: Sharing of Baseline A4 and LEARN Data

Building expert consensus regarding sharing of individual research results in Alzheimers disease research: a Delphi study protocol

Data Governance and Stewardship: Designing Data Stewardship Entities and Advancing Data Access

"I Just Assumed This Was Already Being Done": Canadian Patient Preferences for Enhanced Data Sharing for Precision Oncology

Parent attitudes towards data sharing in developmental science

Comparing Attitudes About Genomic Privacy and Data Sharing in Adolescents and Parents of Children Enrolled in a Genomic Research Repository

Obstacles to European research projects with data and tissue: solutions and further challenges

Public and participant involvement as a pathway to inclusive dementia research

Individual notions of fair data sharing from the perspectives of Swiss stakeholders

Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study

Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study

Frontotemporal dementia: Past, present, and future

Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy