Abstract:Background: Patients and publics are generally positive about data-intensive health research. However, conditions need to be fulfilled for their support. Ensuring confidentiality, security, and privacy of patients' health data is pivotal. Patients and publics have concerns about secondary use of data by commercial parties and the risk of data misuse, reasons for which they favor personal control of their data. Yet, the potential of public benefit highlights the potential of building trust to attenuate these perceptions of harm and risk. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on how conditions for support of data-intensive health research can be operationalized to that end remains scant. Objective: This study aims to inform efforts to design governance frameworks for data-intensive health research, by gaining insight into the preferences of patients and publics for governance policies and measures. Methods: We distributed a digital questionnaire among a purposive sample of patients and publics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric inferential statistics to compare group differences and explore associations between policy preferences. Results: Study participants (N=987) strongly favored sharing their health data for scientific health research. Personal decision-making about which research projects health data are shared with (346/980, 35.3%), which researchers/organizations can have access (380/978, 38.9%), and the provision of information (458/981, 46.7%) were found highly important. Health data-sharing policies strengthening direct personal control, like being able to decide under which conditions health data are shared (538/969, 55.5%), were found highly important. Policies strengthening collective governance, like reliability checks (805/967, 83.2%) and security safeguards (787/976, 80.6%), were also found highly important. Further analysis revealed that participants willing to share health data, to a lesser extent, demanded policies strengthening direct personal control than participants who were reluctant to share health data. This was the case for the option to have health data deleted at any time (P<.001) and the ability to decide the conditions under which health data can be shared (P<.001). Overall, policies and measures enforcing conditions for support at the collective level of governance, like having an independent committee to evaluate requests for access to health data (P=.02), were most strongly favored. This also applied to participants who explicitly stressed that it was important to be able to decide the conditions under which health data can be shared, for instance, whether sanctions on data misuse are in place (P=.03). Conclusions: This study revealed that both a positive attitude toward health data sharing and demand for personal decision-making abilities were associated with policies and measures strengthening control at the collective level of governance. We recommend pursuing the development of this type of governance policy. More importantly, further study is required to understand how governance policies and measures can contribute to the trustworthiness of data-intensive health research.

Modelling of Structures in Fire: An Example of the Boundary Condition

Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective

A critique of the regulation of data science in healthcare research in the European Union

Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust

Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data: informed consent at a cross-road

Bridging the European Data Sharing Divide in Genomic Science

Effect of Side Feed Pressurization on the Performance of Shimmed Foil Gas Bearings-Part II : Model , Predictions and Comparisons to Rotordynamic Measurements

Biobank donation in search of public benefits and the potential impact of intellectual property rights over access to health-technologies developed: A focus on the bioethical implications

Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing

Transnational access to large prospective cohorts in Europe: Current trends and unmet needs

Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study

Access Governance for Biobanks: The Case of the BioSHaRE-EU Cohorts

Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms

Patients' knowledge, preferences, and perspectives about data protection and data control: an exploratory survey

Sharing sensitive data in life sciences: an overview of centralized and federated approaches

Data-driven sudden cardiac arrest research in Europe: Experts' perspectives on ethical challenges and governance strategies

StemBANCC: Governing Access to Material and Data in a Large Stem Cell Research Consortium

Digital Biomarkers in Psychiatric Research: Data Protection Qualifications in a Complex Ecosystem

Ethical and research governance approval across Europe: Experiences from three European palliative care studies

Data protection, information governance and the potential erosion of ethnographic methods in health care?

[The DOSE study].