Abstract:The only known cognitive architecture capable of human-level (or rat-level) performance is the human (rat) brain. Why have cognitive architectures equivalent to those instantiated by mammalian brains not been implemented in computers already? Is it just because we have not yet found the right ‘boxes’ to model in our data flow diagrams? Or is there a mysterious reason requiring the underlying hardware to be biologically-based? We surmise that the answer might lie in between: certain essential biological aspects of nervous systems, not (yet) routinely implemented in computational models of cognition, might prove to be necessary functional components. One such aspect is the tree-like structure of neuronal dendrites and axons, the branching inputs and outputs of nerve cells. The basic roles of dendritic and axonal arbors are respectively to integrate synaptic signals from, and to propagate firing patterns to, thousands of other neurons. Synaptic integration and plasticity in dendrites is mediated by their morphology and biophysics. Axons provide the vast majority of cable length, constituting the main determinant of network connectivity. Together, neuronal computation and circuitry provide the substrates for the activity dynamics instantiating cognitive function.An additional consequence of the tree-shape of neurons is far less recognized. Axons and dendrites determine not only which neurons are connected to which, and thus the possible activation patterns (mental states), but also which new connections might form given the right experience. Specifically, new synapses can only form between axons and dendrites that are in close proximity. This fundamental constraint may constitute the neural correlate of the common observation that knowledge of appropriate background information is necessary for memory formation. Specifically, neurons that are near each other (in connectivity space) encode related information. This biologically inspired design feature also enables cognitive architectures (e.g. neural networks) to learn real associations better than spurious co-occurrences, resulting in greater performance and enhanced robustness to noise.

Brain architecture: A design for natural computation

Natural Computational Architectures for Cognitive Info-Communication

A New Age of Computing and the Brain

Building artificial neural circuits for domain-general cognition: a primer on brain-inspired systems-level architecture

Toward Human-Scale Brain Computing Using 3D Wafer Scale Integration

Architects or Botanists? The Relevance of (Neuronal) Trees to Model Cognition

Neuromorphic Cognitive Systems A Learning And Memory Centered Approach Preface

Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches for the Design of Neuromorphic Processing Systems: Tradeoffs and Synergies Between Natural and Artificial Intelligence

Could a Computer Architect Understand our Brain?

How brains are built: Principles of computational neuroscience

Basic principles drive self-organization of brain-like connectivity structure

Brain-inspired computing with self-assembled networks of nano-objects

Brain-like hardware, do we need it?

Designing Artificial Cognitive Architectures: Brain Inspired or Biologically Inspired?

Benchmarking the human brain against computational architectures

Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems

A brain basis of dynamical intelligence for AI and computational neuroscience

Mesoscopic architecture enhances communication across the macaque connectome revealing structure-function correspondence in the brain

A global framework for a systemic view of brain modeling

Human Brain Computing and Brain-Inspired Intelligence.

Hierarchies of description enable understanding of cognitive phenomena in terms of neuron activity