Genomic characterization of de novo EGFR copy number gain and its impact on the efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Yiquan Xu,Jingjing Yan,Chengzhi Zhou,Lin Wu,Haibo Wang,Jun Zhao,Maolin Zhou,Jingyi Wang,Xinlong Zheng,Longfeng Zhang,Kan Jiang,Xiaobin Zheng,Qian Miao,Shiwen Wu,Zihua Zou,Yuange He,Rongrong Chen,Shanshan Yang,Yujing Li,Sihui Chen,Gen Lin,Rong lian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.009
IF: 10.002
2023-04-22
European Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation generally respond well to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, genomic characterization of de novo EGFR copy number gain (CNG) and its impact on the efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKIs remains unclear. Methods This multicenter, retrospective and real-world study included two cohorts that enrolled EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. EGFR CNG was tested by next-generation sequencing of untreated tissue specimens. Cohort 1 detected the impact of EGFR CNG on first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, and cohort 2 explored the genomic characterization. Results Cohort 1 enrolled 355 patients from 4 cancer centers between January 2013 to March 2022. The patients were divided into three groups, included the EGFR non-CNG, EGFR CNG, and EGFR uncertain-CNG. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was found between the three groups (10.0 months vs. 10.8 months vs. 9.9 months, respectively, p = 0.384). Furthermore, the overall response rate was not statistically significant in the EGFR CNG group compared to the EGFR non-CNG or uncertain arm (70.3% vs. 63.2% vs. 54.5%, respectively, p = 0.154). Cohort 2 included 7876 NSCLC patients with 16.4% showing EGFR CNG. Gene mutations such as TP53, IKZF1, RAC1, MYC, MET, CDKN2A/B and alterations of the metabolic-related and ERK signaling pathway were significantly associated with patients with EGFR CNG compared to those without. Conclusions De novo EGFR CNG had no effect on the efficacy of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients, and tumors with EGFR CNG had more complex genomic profiles than those without.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?