Abstract:“Smart” or “precision” farming has revolutionized crop agriculture but its application to livestock farming has raised ethical concerns because of its possible adverse effects on animal welfare. With rising public concern for animal welfare across the world, some people see the efficiency gains offered by the new technology as a direct threat to the animals themselves, allowing producers to get “more for less” in the interests of profit. Others see major welfare advantages through life-long health monitoring, delivery of individual care and optimization of environmental conditions. The answer to the question of whether smart farming improves or damages animal welfare is likely to depend on three main factors. Firstly, much will depend on how welfare is defined and the extent to which politicians, scientists, farmers and members of the public can agree on what welfare means and so come to a common view on how to judge how it is impacted by technology. Defining welfare as a combination of good health and what the animals themselves want provides a unifying and animal-centered way forward. It can also be directly adapted for computer recognition of welfare. A second critical factor will be whether high welfare standards are made a priority within smart farming systems. To achieve this, it will be necessary both to develop computer algorithms that can recognize welfare to the satisfaction of both the public and farmers and also to build good welfare into the control and decision-making of smart systems. What will matter most in the end, however, is a third factor, which is whether smart farming can actually deliver its promised improvements in animal welfare when applied in the real world. An ethical evaluation will only be possible when the new technologies are more widely deployed on commercial farms and their full social, environmental, financial and welfare implications become apparent.

"A Way to Save a Pig's Life": The Impossibility of Animal Rescue in Charlotte's Web

Beyond the Barnyard: Anthropomorphism and Moral Lessons in E.B. White's 'Charlotte's Web

Animals in Moral Limbo: How Literary Pigs May Help Lab-Generated Ones

Friendship, Humility, and the Complicated Morality of E. B. White’s Charlotte’s Web

Charlotte’s Web: A Fable of the Rise and Fall of National Socialism

INTERRELATION OF HUMANS AND FAUNA: INVESTIGATING MYTH IN E.B.WHITE’S CHARLOTTE’S WEB:

Charlotte's Web:Philosophical Thoughts on the Value of Life

Breaking the Silence about the Animals We Eat

Tenderness and Construction of Life Value——On Fairy Features of Charlotte's Web

Positive Wild Animal Welfare

Save the World's Primates in Peril

Cultural Values in the Novel “Charlotte’s Web - E.B White”: Literary anthropology Approach

The Glocal Practice of Anthropomorphism: Storying Chinese Wild Animals for Young Readers

Does Smart Farming Improve or Damage Animal Welfare? Technology and What Animals Want

Toward the Eco-Narrative: Rethinking the Role of Conflict in Storytelling

The Cultural Work of Animal Narrators in the Contemporary Sub-Saharan African Novel

The Friendship in White’s Charlotte’s Web

Delving Into a World of Non-Human Experience: Unnatural Narrative and Ecological Critique of Chen Yingsong's <i>The Last Dance of a Leopard</i>

The economics of animal welfare

Livestock, ethics, and quality of life

Who Speaks for Nature? Genre, Gender and the Eco-translation of Chinese Wild Animals