P545 Long-term efficacy of ozanimod up to 3 years in patient response subgroups identified using group-based trajectory modelling

S W Schreiber,B G Feagan,B E Sands,F Rieder,J Torres,Z Liu,A Jain,A M Poehler,H Wu,M T Osterman,M T Abreu,P S Dulai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0675
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Ozanimod is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). A previous post hoc analysis of individual outcomes in the phase 3 True North trial (NCT02435992) identified 5 groups of patient-response trajectories to ozanimod using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) and found that populations with fast response had higher rates of disease control, including patient-reported intestinal symptoms and objective measures of disease activity. This analysis of the True North open-label extension study (OLE; NCT02531126) evaluated the durability of ozanimod in the 5 groups for up to 3 years in the OLE (Week [W] 142). Methods In patients who entered the OLE from the 5 patient groups (Group 1 [super-response], Group 2 [sustained improvement], Group 3 [partial improvement], Group 4 [fast rebound], and Group 5 [slow rebound]), symptomatic endpoints were evaluated throughout the OLE until W142. Clinical and mucosal endpoints were evaluated at OLE W46, W94 and W142. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated using nonresponder imputation analysis. Results The percentage of patients who continued into the OLE was similar among the 5 trajectory groups, but higher proportions of patients in Groups 1–3 completed W52 before entering the OLE (Group 1 [84.2%], Group 2 [85.9%], Group 3 [86.7%], Group 4 [32.0%], and Group 5 [28.6%]). Notably, more patients from Groups 1 (60.6%), 2 (62.3%), and 3 (60.0%) completed OLE W142 than those in Groups 4 (20.0%) and 5 (26.3%). More patients in Groups 1–3, with the highest rates in Group 1, retained symptomatic response and remission through OLE W142 with continuous ozanimod treatment compared with those in Groups 4 and 5 (Figure). Higher proportions of patients in Groups 1–3 achieved and sustained response in all clinical and mucosal outcomes at OLE W46, W94, and W142 compared with Groups 4 and 5 (Table). Conclusion This analysis showed that personalized patient trajectory response-based modeling distinguished patients in terms of long-term outcomes. Specifically, patients with more robust patterns of response (Groups 1–3, especially Group 1) had higher sustained rates of symptomatic, clinical, and mucosal efficacy for up to 3 years of ozanimod treatment in the OLE than patients with less robust response patterns (Groups 4 and 5).
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?