P789 Impact of risk factors for Janus kinase inhibitor use identified by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee on the safety and efficacy of ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

B Siegmund,T Kuehbacher,A Armuzzi,A Hart,B Bressler,B G Feagan,H Wu,H A Ahmad,M T Osterman,L Charles,A M Poehler,A Jain,S Danese
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0919
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background With the emergence of oral small molecule therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC), there is a need for identification of favourable safety and efficacy profiles for these therapies. The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency reassessed the benefit–risk of Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) use based upon data showing increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE) and cancer with tofacitinib. Accordingly, the PRAC identified criteria for which a JAKi should be used only if no alternatives are available or used with caution. This analysis of the phase 3 True North (TN) study (NCT02435992) evaluated the safety and efficacy of ozanimod (OZA) by the presence of JAKi PRAC criteria in patients with moderately to severely active UC. Methods Analyses were performed in TN patients comparing those with ≥1 vs no JAKi PRAC criteria at TN baseline (BL). The criteria included age ≥65 y, history of major CV problems, history of CV risk factors (eg, hypertension, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dl, diabetes mellitus), current or former smoker, and history of cancer. Safety was monitored through Week (W) 52 and efficacy endpoints were assessed at W10 and W52 in patients receiving OZA or placebo (PBO). Results At TN BL, 491 patients had ≥1 JAKi PRAC criteria and 521 had no JAKi PRAC criteria. BL patient characteristics were generally similar across groups, but the ≥1 JAKi PRAC criteria group was older (46-48 y vs 36-37 y), with more male patients (62-72% vs 52-61%) and longer UC disease duration (7-9 y vs 6-7 y) vs the no JAKi PRAC criteria group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring during the induction and maintenance periods are shown in Table 1. Overall, TEAE rates were slightly higher in patients with ≥1 vs no JAKi PRAC criteria; however, rates of serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were similar. Bradycardia and hypertension rates were slightly higher in patients with ≥1 vs no JAKi PRAC criteria; rates of other CV and thromboembolic events and cancer were similar between groups. At W10, OZA was more effective than PBO for clinical remission and response, with slightly greater treatment differences in patients with ≥1 vs no JAKi PRAC criteria (Figure 1A). At W52, more OZA/OZA pts achieved all endpoints vs OZA/PBO pts, with slightly greater treatment differences in patients with ≥1 vs no JAKi PRAC criteria (Figure 1B). Conclusion In patients with UC, JAKi PRAC criteria were not associated with greater rates of MACE or cancer with OZA for up to 52 wk, nor did they affect OZA efficacy, suggesting that OZA is a safe and tolerable oral small molecule treatment option for such patients.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?