Abstract:Psychologists and neuroscientists often use complex span tasks or the n -back to measure working memory capacity. At first glance, both tasks require many cognitive processes attributed to the construct, including the maintenance of information amidst interference. Nevertheless, evidence for their convergent validity is mixed. This poses consequences for the interpretation of working memory performance in cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology, applied psychology, and executive functioning research. We recruited a large and diverse sample using a multisite approach ( N = 1,272; community and university participants) and had them complete multiple working memory capacity, updating, and fluid intelligence tests. We found strong evidence for a dissociation between complex span and n -back tests, and more broadly, between working memory capacity and updating factors. Observed correlations between complex span and n -back performance were modest ( r̄ = .25), and at the latent level, the two factors only shared 20% of their variance. Each explained unique variance in fluid intelligence, and each was more strongly related to fluid intelligence than to each other, with updating measures demonstrating stronger relations to fluid intelligence. These results were interpreted via the disengagement hypothesis . What distinguishes updating measures from working memory capacity measures is their relative emphasis on disengagement from outdated information; disengagement drives their strong relation with fluid intelligence because problem-solving requires generating hypotheses but also discarding those discovered to be false. We suggest that researchers who want to measure and draw conclusions about working memory capacity or updating should not use complex span tasks and the n- back interchangeably.

Forward versus backward recall: Modality testing

Are forward and backward recall the same? A dual-task study of digit recall

Tracking Stimulus Representation Across a 2-Back Visual Working Memory Task

Laterality in tactile working memory: The one‐hand version of the Tactual Span

Aging Processes of Working Memory in Different Modalities

Effects of working memory span training on top-down attentional asymmetry at both neural and behavioral levels

Which "working memory" are we talking about? Complex span tasks versus N-back

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory

Evidence for separate backward recall and n-back working memory factors: a large-scale latent variable analysis

Memory Asymmetry of Forward and Backward Associations in Recognition Tasks

Correlative comparison of visual working memory paradigms and associated models

Rapid source forgetting across modalities: A problem for working memory models

Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms

Cross-modal temporal order memory for auditory digits and visual locations: an fMRI study.

Attention focused on memory: The episodic flanker effect with letters, words, colors, and pictures

Recollective and non-recollective processes in working memory retrieval

Modality of language shapes working memory: evidence from digit span and spatial span in ASL signers

Long-Term Effects of Working Memory Retrieval From Prioritized and Deprioritized States

An ALE meta-analytic comparison of verbal working memory tasks

An item response theory approach to the measurement of working memory capacity

Effects of Audiovisual Memory Cues on Working Memory Recall