Abstract:Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.

Correlative comparison of visual working memory paradigms and associated models

Resource or slot model in visual working memory: Are they different?

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

The Role of Location-Context Binding in Nonspatial Visual Working Memory

Dual-task Costs in Memory Recall Precision Reflect Shared Representational Space

Context Binding in Visual Working Memory is Reflected in Bilateral Event-Related Potentials, but Not in Contralateral Delay Activity

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Are Reflected in Different ERP and EEG Patterns to Task Difficulty

Evaluating Working Memory Representations during the Attentional Blink: A Comparative Modeling Approach

Does Visual Working Memory Work As a Few Fixed Slots?

Overlapping neural representations for selection in attention and working memory

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

An interference model for visual and verbal working memory.

A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis

The Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory:Evidence from ERPs

Effective connectivity of working memory performance: a DCM study of MEG data

Electrophysiological correlates of visual memory search

Is the Inter-Item Association in Working Memory Resource Demanding? Rejecting a Dual-Route Model

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

Zooming in on what counts as core and auxiliary: A case study on recognition models of visual working memory

Shared Representational Formats for Information Maintained in Working Memory and Information Retrieved from Long-Term Memory.

Quantifying resource sharing in working memory