Abstract:Purpose Whilst the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance has been well documented, CSR has rarely been studied from the perspective of corporate poverty alleviation. This study aims to test whether participation in targeted poverty alleviation (TPA) affects firms' market value and to explore how the magnitudes of market value vary in different CSR environments. Design/methodology/approach Based on recent Chinese TPA initiatives and on 108 TPA announcements of Chinese-listed firms from 2016 to 2020, this study adopts an event study method to investigate the impact of firm's TPA announcements on the firm's market value. Then, the authors construct a cross-sectional regression to analyse different CSR factors that may affect market reactions. Findings The results demonstrate that TPA announcements can increase a firm's overall market value. Additionally, the results show that TPA way and firm ownership significantly moderate the market reaction, namely the positive reaction is more significant when the TPA announcements involve charity poverty alleviation rather than industrial poverty alleviation and for privately owned firms rather than state-owned firms. Practical implications The empirical results help TPA practitioners obtain a nuanced understanding of whether and when to participate in poverty alleviation is worthwhile. This study also provides a reference for poverty alleviation work in countries with similar backgrounds. Originality/value This study not only provides empirical evidence for the consequences of poverty alleviation behaviour of firms in developing countries, but also complements the field of CSR research in developed countries.

Is corporate community involvement associated with poverty and income inequality? International evidence

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Do political connections affect corporate poverty alleviation decisions? Evidence from China

Does Ownership Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from Chinese Companies' Response to Targeted Poverty Alleviation

Government Initiated Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: Evidence from a Poverty Alleviation Campaign in China

Corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from Chinese targeted poverty alleviation

The peer effects of corporate poverty alleviation behavior: Empirical evidence from China

Targeted poverty alleviation and corporate financial performance: The CSR strategy perspective

Targeted Poverty Alleviation Initiatives, Corporate Governance Structures and Corporate Value: Evidence from China

The power of CEO growing up in poverty: Enabling better corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance

Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China

CEO poverty experience and corporate environmental violations

The role of Cross‐Border alliances in corporate social responsibility: International evidence

Corporate Social Responsibility and Wage Inequality

Corporate community involvement disclosures in annual report: A measure of corporate community development or a signal of CSR observance?

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from Korea

Social sustainability, poverty and income: An empirical exploration

Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives

Social Insurance Burden and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China