Abstract:Purpose This study aims to analyse the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on corporate innovation efficiency and the mechanism underlying this effect. Design/methodology/approach Data of non-financial listed companies operating in China from 2010 to 2019 were employed. Dual fixed-effects and dynamic panel models were used to explore the relationship between CSR and corporate innovation efficiency, and analyse its heterogeneity. Findings The researchers found that CSR reduces innovation efficiency in China. Further, (1) when enterprises conduct CSR to obtain excess returns, it is easy to form excess goodwill; (2) under the pressure of the government and society, enterprises passively assume CSR, thereby crowding out R&D funds; and (3) regardless of whether companies in the high-tech industry actively or passively assume social responsibilities, CSR will not have a significant impact on their innovation efficiency. Research limitations/implications The sample of this research is limited to Chinese A-share listed companies and lacks consideration for small and medium-sized enterprises. Therefore, whether the conclusions of this article are applicable to small and medium-sized enterprises or family enterprises needs further verification. Practical implications The research explores the intrinsic motivation and possible consequences of CSR from the dual perspectives of corporate active and passive. Social implications The ultimate goal of a firm is to make a profit. In practice, few enterprises pay without any return. Perhaps some companies actively assume social responsibilities in order to obtain greater benefits, while passively assume social responsibilities due to oppression. Originality/value This study analyses the impact of CSR on corporate innovation efficiency from both active and passive perspectives. The results have important implications for government officials and entrepreneurs.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Wage Inequality

How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have Influence on Firms' Access to Trade Credit

Corporate social responsibility and the executive-employee pay disparity

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Trade Credit: Evidence from Chinese Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Not all stakeholders are created equal: executive vertical pay disparity and firms’ choice of internal and external CSR

A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China

CSR Gap and Firm Performance: an Organizational Justice Perspective

Executive Compensation of SOEs and Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia

Social Conflict and Wage Inequality

Corporate Social Responsibility,Ownership and the Cost of Equity Capital

Prize or Price? Corporate Social Responsibility Commitment and Sales Performance in the Chinese Private Sector

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry?

Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms

Corporate responsibility towards employees and innovation: Evidence from an emerging market

Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from China

Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China

Social responsibility and corporate borrowing