Are Travel Bans the Answer to Stopping the Spread of COVID-19 Variants? Lessons from a Multi-Country SIR Model

Frédéric Docquier,Nicolas Golenvaux,Pierre Schaus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1254291/v1

2022-01-19

Abstract:Abstract Background: Detections of mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus gave rise to new packages of interventions. Among them, international travel restrictions have been one of the fastest and most visible responses to limit the spread of the variants. While inducing large economic losses, the epidemiological consequences of such travel restrictions are highly uncertain. They may be poorly effective when the new highly transmissible strain of the virus already circulates in many regions. Assessing the effectiveness of travel bans is difficult given the paucity of data on daily cross-border mobility and on existing variant circulation. The question is topical and timely as the new omicron variant -- classified as a variant of concern by WHO -- has been detected in Southern Africa, and perceived as (potentially) more contagious than previous strains. In this study, we develop a multi-country compartmental model of the SIR type. We use it to simulate the spread of a new variant across European countries, and to assess the effectiveness of unilateral and multilateral travel bans. Results: Multilateral travel bans do not buy much time, by increasing the time until the infection curve peaks by a few weeks at best. This can be achieved with drastic travel bans only, and this fails to stop the propagation when the virus is already circulating in the country, or in regions not included in the travel bans. Conclusion: Given their huge economic and freedom-killing consequences, travel bans have negligible effects on the timing and severity of the infection response. Managing new waves of COVID-19 with local sanitary measures applicable to cross-border movers is the most effective option. It induces better epidemiological outcomes and smaller economic cost for all parties concerned.