Temporal variations in international air travel: implications for modelling the spread of infectious diseases

Jack Wardle,Sangeeta Bhatia,Anne Cori,Pierre Nouvellet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taae062
2024-04-17
Journal of Travel Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Background The international flight network creates multiple routes by which pathogens can quickly spread across the globe. In the early stages of infectious disease outbreaks, analyses using flight passenger data to identify countries at risk of importing the pathogen are common and can help inform disease control efforts. A challenge faced in this modelling is that the latest aviation statistics (referred to as contemporary data) are typically not immediately available. Therefore, flight patterns from a previous year are often used (referred to as historical data). We explored the suitability of historical data for predicting the spatial spread of emerging epidemics. Methods We analysed monthly flight passenger data from the International Air Transport Association to assess how baseline air travel patterns were affected in outbreaks of MERS, Zika, and SARS-CoV-2 over the past decade. We then used a stochastic discrete time SEIR metapopulation model to simulate global spread of different pathogens, comparing how epidemic dynamics differed in simulations based on historical and contemporary data. Results We observed local, short-term disruptions to air travel from South Korea and Brazil for the MERS and Zika outbreaks we studied, whereas global and longer-term flight disruption occurred during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. For outbreak events that were accompanied by local, small, and short-term changes in air travel, epidemic models using historical flight data gave similar projections of timing and locations of disease spread as when using contemporary flight data. However, historical data were less reliable to model the spread of an atypical outbreak such as SARS-CoV-2 in which there were durable and extensive levels of global travel disruption. Conclusions The use of historical flight data as a proxy in epidemic models is an acceptable practice except in rare, large epidemics that lead to substantial disruptions to international travel.
medicine, general & internal,infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore whether historical flight data are suitable for predicting the spatial spread of emerging infectious diseases. Specifically, the researchers analyzed the impact of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Zika virus, and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS - CoV - 2) epidemics in the past decade on international air travel patterns, and evaluated the differences between using historical flight data and contemporary flight data in predicting the epidemic spread dynamics by simulating the global spread of different pathogens. ### Background The international flight network provides multiple routes for the rapid spread of pathogens worldwide. In the early stages of an infectious disease outbreak, it is very common to use flight passenger data to identify countries that may import pathogens, which helps to guide disease control efforts. However, one challenge is that the latest aviation statistics (i.e., contemporary data) are usually not immediately available, so flight data from the previous year (i.e., historical data) are often used. This paper explores the applicability of historical data in predicting the spatial spread of emerging epidemics. ### Methods 1. **Data analysis**: - The researchers used monthly flight passenger data provided by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) to analyze the changes in the number of flight passengers departing from South Korea, Brazil, and China between 2012 and 2020. - They also analyzed the changes in the main destinations of these countries during the epidemic. 2. **Simulation study**: - Using a stochastic discrete - time Susceptible - Exposed - Infected - Recovered (SEIR) metapopulation model, the spread of pathogens around the world was simulated. - Three different epidemic scenarios were simulated: MERS, Zika, and SARS - CoV - 2, and historical data and contemporary data were used for comparison respectively. ### Results 1. **Changes in the number of flight passengers**: - During the MERS and Zika epidemics, the number of flight passengers in South Korea and Brazil decreased in the short term, but the overall impact was small. - During the SARS - CoV - 2 epidemic, the global number of flight passengers decreased significantly, especially in April 2020, when the number of flight passengers in South Korea, Brazil, and China decreased by 98.6%, 97.9%, and 98.6% respectively. 2. **Changes in main destinations**: - Before the SARS - CoV - 2 epidemic, the main destinations of these three countries were relatively stable, but there were large changes in 2020. 3. **Simulation results**: - For the MERS and Zika epidemics, the simulation results using historical data and contemporary data were very close, and the predicted spread time and sequence were similar. - For the SARS - CoV - 2 epidemic, the simulation results using historical data significantly underestimated the time of epidemic spread, especially in cases with a long generation time or a low basic reproduction number. ### Conclusions Using historical flight data as a proxy is acceptable in most cases, especially for those epidemics that cause local, small - scale, and short - term travel changes. However, in large - scale epidemics that have a long - term impact on international travel (such as SARS - CoV - 2), the reliability of historical data is low and may lead to a serious underestimation of the epidemic spread speed. Therefore, for rare large - scale epidemics, historical data may need to be corrected to more accurately predict the contemporary spread of pathogens.