The art of knowing others : The Renwu zhi and its cultural background *

Licia Di Giacinto

Abstract:The birth of the Wei 魏 dynasty (220–265 AD) along the reaches of the Yellow river saw the fight among different ways to interpret imperial institutions and the society as a whole. Torn between the dream to revive the splendour of the Han 漢 dynasty (206 BC – 220 AD) and the necessity to look for new paths, Cao Pi’s 曹丕 (187–226) court swarmed with scholars and intellectuals who competed for visibility. Many of them comprehended the necessity to have a confrontation with the recent historical cataclysm: in front of the arduous task to explain the reasons which had led to the definitive downfall of the Han dynasty, the Wei scholars were unable to find a unanimous diagnosis. Several intellectuals highlighted the problem of recruitment of capable and honest officials. On the other side, there were those who explained the historical debacle of the second and third century AD through the Han cosmic paradigm and, in particular, with the theory of heaven’s mandate (tianming 天命). The Renwu zhi 人物志, written by Liu Shao 劉劭 (ca. 186–245) at the beginning of the third century AD, has to be understood in this context.1 The medieval text very early attracted the attention of the sinological world. As early as 1937, when several basic texts of Chinese tradition were still awaiting for reflection and consideration, Shryock “discovered” and translated the text integrally. His useful introductory notes present the Renwu zhi as a psychological treatise on typology of human characters. This sudden concern for a work, which, in spite of the recent translation by Lara,2 has never gained again a wide resonance, can only be understood within the intellectual context of the thirties, when America faced the interrelated intellectual action of behaviourism and neopositivism. At the beginning of the twentieth century, in fact, American psychology began to experience a traumatic evolution. The strong call for transforming psychology in a strict empirical science led scholars to shift the focus on those phenomena that could be objectively analysed and measured. The new exigencies caused, in turn, the gradual fading in importance of traditional concepts as “consciousness”, “mind”, and “feeling”. From a methodological perspective, thus, the psychologists substituted the analysis of the mind with the observation of human behaviour. On a more theoretical level, a new target was set, namely the

Art,History