Abstract:The development of solid-state batteries has gained significant attention in recent years, owing to their potential to enhance the temperature range and energy density of energy storage devices. Sulfide-based electrolytes are some of the most promising candidates for solid-state batteries, thanks to their high ionic conductivity and low processing temperature. For lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, the transition from liquid to solid electrolytes holds even greater promise. Sulfur is a readily available cathode material known for its high specific capacity, which endows Li-S batteries with remarkable specific energy and favourable environmental and economic impact. In liquid electrolytes however, the solubility of sulfur and lithium polysulfide causes a multitude of issues that hamper the performance of the Li-S system: rapid self-discharge, redox shuttle mechanism during charging, and loss of active sulfur and lithium material due to direct chemical reactivity. Solid-state Li-S cells are not prone to these issues, but they have, of course, issues of their own. Amongst them, the stability of the interface between the electrolyte and the lithium is of crucial importance to allow the use of this very high energy density negative electrode. In the present study, we compare two sulfide electrolytes, Li 6 PS 5 Cl and Li 7 P 3 S 11 , and assess their respective stability against lithium. We used innovative methods to characterize the interphase between the sulfide and the lithium without damaging it upon dismantling the cell. The nature and the properties of this interphase was characterised via EIS, XPS and ToF-SIMS. The EIS study showed that Li 6 PS 5 Cl forms a much more stable interphase with lithium than Li 7 P 3 S 11 , which is in accordance with most recent results in the literature. The XPS study confirmed the chemical composition of the interphase. Li 2 S and Li 3 P were present for both electrolytes. In the case of Li 6 PS 5 Cl, LiCl was also identified as expected. Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) assisted abrasion of the interphase followed by in-situ XPS and ToF-SIMS suggested a separation of the components of the interphase depending on the depth of the abrasion. The interphase was found to be organised as Li 2 S-, Li 3 P- or LiCl-rich discrete layers, with the Li 2 S-rich layer being consistently the closest to lithium. This result confirms and completes the most recent research in the field published by Otto et al. in 2022 (doi: 10.1002/admi.202102387). To establish solid-state batteries as a practical energy storage option, it is essential to fully understand and effectively manage the Li-electrolyte interface. These findings suggest that thanks to the relative stability of its interface with lithium, Li 6 PS 5 Cl is the better option for solid-state lithium metal cells. It also sheds light on the reasons why this interface is more stable. The self-assembled lamellar structure of the interphase could also inspire strategies to better control the stability of solid electrolytes versus lithium.

Isotropic cell design enables low-pressure lithium metal solid-state batteries

(Invited) Sulfide-Based Solid Electrolytes for Solid State Batteries

A Dynamically Stable Sulfide Electrolyte Architecture for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

Breaking free from high pressure

Maintaining Interfacial Transports for Sulfide-Based All-Solid-State Batteries Operating at Low External Pressure

High-safety, wide-temperature-range, low-external-pressure and dendrite-free lithium battery with sulfide solid electrolyte

A facile path from fast synthesis of Li-argyrodite conductor to dry forming ultrathin electrolyte membrane for high-energy-density all-solid-state lithium batteries

High‐Entropy Argyrodite‐Type Sulfide Electrolyte with High Conductivity and Electro‐Chemo‐Mechanical Stability for Fast‐Charging All‐Solid‐State Batteries

High Ionic Conductive, Mechanical Robust Sulfide Solid Electrolyte Films and Interface Design for All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries

LiAlO2-coated LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 and chlorine-rich argyrodite enabling high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries at suitable stack pressure

Realizing the Dendrite-Free Sulfide-Based All-Solid-state Li Metal Battery by Surface Design

Enabling Uniform and Accurate Control of Cycling Pressure for All-Solid-State Batteries

Enhancing solid-state lithium metal battery performance via indium-based modification of electrolytes and lithium metal surfaces: mechanistic insights and optimization

All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Solid Electrolytes with Low-Temperature Processability

A High Ion Conductive Solid Electrolyte Film and Interface Stabilization Strategy for Solid-state Li-S Battery

Regulating p‐Band Center of Sulfur in Li‐Argyrodite to Stabilize Dual Solid–Solid Interface for Robust All‐Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Battery

Designing High-Performance Sulfide-Based All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries: from Laboratory to Practical Application

Argyrodite Solid Electrolyte-Integrated Ni-Rich Oxide Cathode with Enhanced Interfacial Compatibility for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries

A highly utilized and practical lithium-sulfur cathode enabled in all-solid-state batteries

Sulfide-Based Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: An in-Depth Study of the Li-Electrolyte Interface

Realizing high-capacity all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries using a low-density inorganic solid-state electrolyte