Abstract:Construct & background: In order to determine students' level of interprofessional competencies, there is a need for well-considered and thoroughly designed interprofessional assessments. Current literature about interprofessional assessments focuses largely on the development and validation of assessment instruments such as self-assessments or questionnaires to assess students' knowledge or attitudes. Less is known about the design and validity of integral types of assessment in interprofessional education, such as case-based assessments, or performance assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence for and threats to the validity of the decisions about students' interprofessional performances based on such integral assessment task. We investigated whether the assessment prototype is a precursor to practice (authenticity) and whether the assessment provides valid information to determine the level of interprofessional competence (scoring). Approach: We used a design-based qualitative research design in which we conducted three group interviews with teachers, students, and interprofessional assessment experts. In semi-structured group interviews, participants evaluated the evidence for and threats to the validity of an interprofessional assessment task, which were analyzed using deductive and inductive content analysis. Findings: Although both evidence for and threats to validity were mentioned, the threats refuting the assessment's validity prevailed. Evidence for the authenticity aspect was that the assessment task, conducting a team meeting, is common in practice. However, its validity was questioned because the assessment task appeared more structured as compared to practice. The most frequently mentioned threat to the scoring aspect was that the process of interprofessional collaboration between the students could not be evaluated sufficiently by means of this assessment task. Conclusions: This study showed that establishing interprofessional assessment validity requires three major balancing acts. The first is the balance between authenticity and complexity. As interprofessional practice and competencies are complex, interprofessional tasks require build-up or guidance toward this complexity and chaotic practice. The second is that between authenticity and scoring, in which optimal authenticity might lead to threats to scoring and vice versa. Simultaneous optimal authenticity and scoring seems impossible, requiring ongoing evaluation and monitoring of interprofessional assessment validity to ensure authentic yet fair assessments for all participating professions. The third balancing act is between team scoring and individual scoring. As interprofessional practice requires collaboration and synthesis of diverse professions, the team process is at the heart of solving interprofessional tasks. However, to stimulate individual accountability, the individual performance should not be neglected.

A systematic review and quality appraisal of interprofessional behavioral assessment instruments for nursing education

Assessment of interprofessional competence in undergraduate health professions education: protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments

A comparison of the validity of two instruments assessing health professional student perceptions of interprofessional education and practice

Interprofessional education assessment and planning instrument for academic institutions

The development of a research-based interprofessional communication behaviors repository in healthcare education: A systematic review

Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: An updated systematic review

Development of a questionnaire to assess student behavioral confidence to undertake interprofessional education activities

Interprofessional education in undergraduate dental curricula: A systematic review

Measuring evidence-based practice knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behavior in students of manual therapy education programs: A scoping review of instruments and their measurement properties

Assessing preregistration nursing students' clinical competence: A systematic review of objective measures

Programmatic evaluation of interprofessional education: a quality improvement tool

Tools for self- or peer-assessment of interprofessional competencies of healthcare students: a scoping review

Preliminary Psychometrics of the Knowledge and Attitudes Toward SBAR Instrument (KA-SBAR)

Interprofessional education: a unique approach to addressing the challenges of student assessment

Non-technical skills assessment for prelicensure nursing students: An integrative review

The Balancing Act of Assessment Validity in Interprofessional Healthcare Education: A Qualitative Evaluation Study

Testing the Nursing Quality and Safety Self-Inventory

Challenges and opportunities of evaluating work based interprofessional learning: insights from a pediatric interprofessional training ward

Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the informatics competence of nurses: A systematic review

Informatics Competency Measurement Instruments for Nursing Students: A Rapid Review

A comprehensive systematic review of pharmacy perspectives on interprofessional education and collaborative practice