Automated External Defibrillators Are Only Effective If Put to Use

Isabel Ostrer,Tracy Y. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7252
2024-02-06
JAMA Internal Medicine
Abstract:In their cohort study in this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine , Kolkailah et al 1 found that rates of bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) use were similarly low in both states that mandate and those that do not mandate such devices in recreational facilities: 19% vs 18%. The fact that cardiac arrests with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation rhythms have significantly better odds of survival when early cardiopulmonary resuscitation is performed has likely motivated policies to expand AED availability. 2 However, availability alone does not guarantee appropriate use by bystanders.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?