Tracking earmarked funding to international organizations: Introducing the earmarked funding dataset

Bernhard Reinsberg,Mirko Heinzel,Christian Siauwijaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09548-1

2024-05-12

The Review of International Organizations

Abstract:Over the past two decades, donor funding of international organizations (IOs) such as the United Nations, has shifted from core resources toward earmarked contributions. While core resources provide IOs with discretion how to achieve their mandates, earmarked contributions require IOs to focus their assistance on specific themes, sectors, countries, or projects, as determined by the donors. Our understanding of the drivers and effects of earmarked funding has been limited by the lack of systematic data. To address this gap, we introduce the Earmarked Funding Dataset . The dataset contains 342,812 earmarked aid activities from nearly 50 donors with over 340 IOs with a mandate in international development from 1990 to 2020. We first explore the data descriptively to cast light on the evolution of the multilateral development system. We then use the data to examine whether and how donors financially reward well-performing IOs. To that end, we combine our data with newly available performance data synthesized from Multilateral Organization Performance Assessment Network (MOPAN) evaluations of 32 IOs in 2009–2020. Using difference-in-difference estimations, we find a significantly positive relationship between outcome performance and earmarked contributions. In contrast, performance does not seem to affect core resources. These patterns suggest that donors reward well-performing multilaterals with more funding, albeit based on development outcomes which are not easily contractible. From a policy perspective, these findings suggest that performance-based approaches to aid allocation—as they are currently practiced—upload the financial risks of organizational reform processes to international organizations.

economics,international relations,political science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of earmarked funding in the allocation of funds by international organizations (IOs) and its impact. Specifically:

1. **Data Scarcity Issue**: Current research on earmarked funding is limited by a lack of systematic data, especially within the multilateral development system. Although the United Nations and other institutions provide some data, the coverage is limited and does not fully reflect the situation of earmarked funding.

2. **Description of Fund Flows**: By introducing the "Earmarked Funding Dataset," researchers can more accurately describe the flow of funds within the multilateral system. This dataset includes data on 342,812 earmarked aid activities from nearly 50 donors to over 340 international organizations between 1990 and 2020.

3. **Performance Evaluation and Fund Allocation Relationship**: The paper also explores how donors adjust their fund allocation based on the performance evaluation of international organizations. The study finds that after an organization receives a positive performance evaluation, donors increase their earmarked funding, while core funding remains unaffected.

4. **Control Mechanism Analysis**: Based on principal-agent theory, the paper discusses how donors control the activities of international organizations through different types of funding mechanisms and proposes a systematic, effective, and replicable method for measuring the stringency of earmarked funding.

Through the above analysis, the paper aims to fill the data gap in existing research on earmarked funding and reveal the actual impact of this funding model on the operations of international organizations.