Abstract:figure legend Summary of the complementary dominance hypothesis of motor lateralization and its application in remediating functional motor deficits of the ipsilesional arm in stroke survivors. The complementary dominance model of motor lateralization highlights distinct yet complementary functional contributions of each hemisphere to movement control (top panel). The dominant (left) hemisphere specializes in optimal control of limb dynamics and is therefore advantaged for well‐established behavioural patterns under predictable circumstances. The non‐dominant (right) hemisphere specializes in impedance control, which regulates steady‐state limb position and responses to unexpected stimuli in the environment. Unilateral stroke results in hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in both the contralesional and ipsilesional arms that are functionally limiting and consistent with the complementary dominance hypothesis. Left hemisphere stroke leads to deficits in initial direction accuracy, resulting in curved hand trajectories (middle panel, right). By contrast, right hemisphere stroke impairs final position accuracy, as demonstrated by larger deviations from the target location (middle panel, left). Based on these observations, we are now testing a novel training intervention to remediate functional motor deficits of the ipsilesional arm for chronic, severely impaired stroke survivors. The intervention includes hemisphere‐specific virtual‐reality training (bottom panel, top row) and real‐world dexterity training (bottom panel, lower row), which we expect to translate to improved functional independence. The complementary dominance hypothesis is a novel model of motor lateralization substantiated by decades of research examining interlimb differences in the control of upper extremity movements in neurotypical adults and hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in stroke survivors. In contrast to earlier ideas that attribute handedness to the specialization of one hemisphere, our model proposes complementary motor control specializations in each hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere mediates optimal control of limb dynamics as required for smooth and efficient movements, whereas the non‐dominant hemisphere mediates impedance control, important for countering unexpected mechanical conditions and achieving steady‐state limb positions. Importantly, this model proposes that each hemisphere contributes its specialization to both arms (though with greater influence from either arm's contralateral hemisphere) and thus predicts that lesions to one hemisphere should produce hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in not only the contralesional arm, but also the ipsilesional arm of stroke survivors – a powerful prediction now supported by a growing body of evidence. Such ipsilesional arm motor deficits vary with contralesional arm impairment, and thus individuals with little to no functional use of the contralesional arm experience both the greatest impairments in the ipsilesional arm, as well as the greatest reliance on it to serve as the main or sole manipulator for activities of daily living. Accordingly, we have proposed and tested a novel intervention that reduces hemisphere‐specific ipsilesional arm deficits and thereby improves functional independence in stroke survivors with severe contralesional impairment.

How the somatosensory system adapts to the motor change in Stroke: A hemispheric Shift?

Somatotopic Reorganization of Hand Representation in Bilateral Arm Amputees with or Without Special Foot Movement Skill.

Multimodal Sensing in Stroke Motor Rehabilitation

Somatosensory integration in robot-assisted motor restoration post-stroke

Cortical Sensorimotor Integration as a Neural Origin of Impaired Grip Force Direction Control following Stroke

A pilot study: effect of somatosensory loss on motor corrections in response to unknown loads in a reaching task by chronic stroke survivors

A Unifying Pathophysiological Account for Post-stroke Spasticity and Disordered Motor Control

Altered Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity Associated With Somatosensory Impairments in the Upper Limb in the Early Sub-Acute Phase Post-Stroke

Expansion of Contralesional Sensory Representation to Ipsilesional Hindlimb Stimulation in Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke in Rat Model.

Moving toward elucidating alternative motor pathway structures post-stroke: the value of spinal cord neuroimaging

Intervention-induced changes in neural connectivity during motor preparation may affect cortical activity at motor execution

The independence of impairments in proprioception and visuomotor adaptation after stroke

The complementary dominance hypothesis: a model for remediating the 'good' hand in stroke survivors

Motor Control System for Adaptation of Healthy Individuals and Recovery of Poststroke Patients: A Case Study on Muscle Synergies

Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke

Plastic Change along the Intact Crossed Pathway in Acute Phase of Cerebral Ischemia Revealed by Optical Intrinsic Signal Imaging.

A lateralized motor network in order to understand adaptation to visuomotor rotation

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.

Cortical mapping of active and passive upper limb training in stroke patients and healthy people: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study

Effects of Hemispheric Stroke Localization on the Reorganization of Arm Movements within Different Mechanical Environments