Abstract:figure legend Summary of the complementary dominance hypothesis of motor lateralization and its application in remediating functional motor deficits of the ipsilesional arm in stroke survivors. The complementary dominance model of motor lateralization highlights distinct yet complementary functional contributions of each hemisphere to movement control (top panel). The dominant (left) hemisphere specializes in optimal control of limb dynamics and is therefore advantaged for well‐established behavioural patterns under predictable circumstances. The non‐dominant (right) hemisphere specializes in impedance control, which regulates steady‐state limb position and responses to unexpected stimuli in the environment. Unilateral stroke results in hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in both the contralesional and ipsilesional arms that are functionally limiting and consistent with the complementary dominance hypothesis. Left hemisphere stroke leads to deficits in initial direction accuracy, resulting in curved hand trajectories (middle panel, right). By contrast, right hemisphere stroke impairs final position accuracy, as demonstrated by larger deviations from the target location (middle panel, left). Based on these observations, we are now testing a novel training intervention to remediate functional motor deficits of the ipsilesional arm for chronic, severely impaired stroke survivors. The intervention includes hemisphere‐specific virtual‐reality training (bottom panel, top row) and real‐world dexterity training (bottom panel, lower row), which we expect to translate to improved functional independence. The complementary dominance hypothesis is a novel model of motor lateralization substantiated by decades of research examining interlimb differences in the control of upper extremity movements in neurotypical adults and hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in stroke survivors. In contrast to earlier ideas that attribute handedness to the specialization of one hemisphere, our model proposes complementary motor control specializations in each hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere mediates optimal control of limb dynamics as required for smooth and efficient movements, whereas the non‐dominant hemisphere mediates impedance control, important for countering unexpected mechanical conditions and achieving steady‐state limb positions. Importantly, this model proposes that each hemisphere contributes its specialization to both arms (though with greater influence from either arm's contralateral hemisphere) and thus predicts that lesions to one hemisphere should produce hemisphere‐specific motor deficits in not only the contralesional arm, but also the ipsilesional arm of stroke survivors – a powerful prediction now supported by a growing body of evidence. Such ipsilesional arm motor deficits vary with contralesional arm impairment, and thus individuals with little to no functional use of the contralesional arm experience both the greatest impairments in the ipsilesional arm, as well as the greatest reliance on it to serve as the main or sole manipulator for activities of daily living. Accordingly, we have proposed and tested a novel intervention that reduces hemisphere‐specific ipsilesional arm deficits and thereby improves functional independence in stroke survivors with severe contralesional impairment.

A lateralized motor network in order to understand adaptation to visuomotor rotation

Left/Right Brain, human motor control and the implications for robotics

Different Control Strategies Drive Interlimb Differences in Performance and Adaptation during Reaching Movements in Novel Dynamics

Neuronal Representation of Bimanual Arm Motor Imagery in the Motor Cortex of a Tetraplegia Human, a Pilot Study.

A bi-hemispheric neuronal network model of the cerebellum with spontaneous climbing fiber firing produces asymmetrical motor learning during robot control

Lateralized distribution of motor areas involved in voluntary movement]

Experience-Dependent Hemispheric Dominance During Motor Planning

Construction of a bi-hemispheric cerebellar neuronal network model with realistic climbing fiber input and its application to adaptive control of an unstable robot

The complementary dominance hypothesis: a model for remediating the 'good' hand in stroke survivors

Reconfiguring motor circuits for a joint manual and BCI task

Lateralized Functional Connectivity of the Sensorimotor Cortex and its Variations During Complex Visuomotor Tasks

Planning and movement activities co-adapt in a motor-reference frame during 3D BCI-controlled reach adaptation in monkey frontal and parietal cortices

Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers

A Revised Computational Neuroanatomy for Motor Control

Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke

Dynamic Lateralization in Contralateral-Projecting Corticospinal Neurons During Motor Learning

BLSAN: A Brain Lateralization-Guided Subject Adaptive Network for Motor Imagery Classification

Interhemispheric Functional Reorganization and its Structural Base After BCI-Guided Upper-Limb Training in Chronic Stroke

Learning in brain-computer interface control evidenced by joint decomposition of brain and behavior

Cerebellar control over inter-regional excitatory/inhibitory dynamics discriminates execution from observation of an action

Functional Integration of the Subregions of the Primary Motor Cortex: The Impact of Handedness and Hemispheric Lateralization