Abstract:In 1835 Lobachevski entertained the possibility of multiple (rival) geometries. This idea has reappeared on occasion (e.g., Poincaré) but didn't become key in space-time foundations prior to Brown's \emph{Physical Relativity} (at the end, the interpretive key to the book). A crucial difference between his constructivism and orthodox "space-time realism" is modal scope. Constructivism applies to all local classical field theories, including those with multiple geometries. But the orthodox view provincially assumes a unique geometry, as familiar theories (Newton, Special Relativity, Nordström, and GR) have. They serve as the orthodox "canon." Their historical roles suggest a story of inevitable progress. Physics literature after c. 1920 is relevant to orthodoxy mostly as commentary on the canon, which closed in the 1910s. The orthodox view explains the behavior of matter as the manifestation of the real space-time geometry, which works within the canon. The orthodox view, Whiggish history, and the canon relate symbiotically. If one considers a theory outside the canon, space-time realism sheds little light on matter's behavior. Worse, it gives the wrong answer when applied to an example arguably in the canon, massive scalar gravity with universal coupling. Which is the true geometry---the flat metric from the Poincaré symmetry, the conformally flat metric exhibited by material rods and clocks, or both---or is the question bad? How does space-time realism explain that all matter fields see the same curved geometry, given so many ways to mix and match? Constructivist attention to dynamical details is vindicated; geometrical shortcuts disappoint. The more exhaustive exploration of relativistic field theories (especially massive) in particle physics is an underused resource for foundations.

Monistic conception of geometry

GEOMETRY MODULI SPACES

Multivariance as a crucial property of microcosm

Different representations of Euclidean geometry and their application to the space-time geometry

Hysteresis and Noise in Stripe and Clump Forming Systems

New foundations for geometry

Axiomatization of geometry employing group actions

Generalization of the relativity theory on the arbitrary space-time geometry

Noncommutative geometry and MOND

Generalized pseudo-Riemannian geometry

Geometry as an object of experience: Kant and the missed debate between Poincaré and Einstein

Commutative Geometries are Spin Manifolds

Space-time Constructivism vs. Modal Provincialism: Or, How Special Relativistic Theories Needn't Show Minkowski Chronogeometry

Generalized Differential Geometry

Covariance, Geometricity, Setting, and Dynamical Structures on Cosmological Manifold

Analytic Geometry of Homogeneous Spaces

On the relativity of magnitudes: Delboeuf's forgotten contribution to the 19th century problem of space

Unity in Major Themes - Convergence vs. Arbitrariness in the Development of Mathematics

Geometry of Singular Space

How Many Structure Constants do Exist in Riemannian Geometry?

A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870