Abstract:This paper investigates visual media shared by US national politicians on Twitter, how a politician's variety of image types shared reflects their political position, and identifies a hazard in using standard methods for image characterization in this context. While past work has yielded valuable results on politicians' use of imagery in social media, that work has focused primarily on photographic media, which may not be sufficient given the variety of visual media shared in such spaces (e.g., infographics, illustrations, or memes). Leveraging three popular deep learning models to characterize politicians' visuals, this work uses clustering to identify eight types of visual media shared on Twitter, several of which are not photographic in nature. Results also show individual politicians share a variety of these types, and the distributions of their imagery across these clusters is correlated with their overall ideological position -- e.g., liberal politicians appear to share a larger proportion of infographic-style images, and conservative politicians appear to share more patriotic imagery. At the same time, manual assessment reveals that these image characterization models group images with vastly different semantic meaning into the same clusters, as confirmed in a post-hoc analysis of hateful memetic imagery. These results suggest that, while image-characterization techniques do identify general types of imagery that correlate with political ideology, these methods miss critical semantic -- and therefore politically relevant -- differences among images. Consequently, care should be taken when dealing with the varieties of imagery shared in online spaces, especially in political contexts.

Coordinated through aWeb of Images: Analysis of Image-based Influence Operations from China, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela

Exploiting the Right: Inferring Ideological Alignment in Online Influence Campaigns Using Shared Images

Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Election

Uncovering Coordinated Cross-Platform Information Operations Threatening the Integrity of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Online Discussion

Characterizing the Use of Images in State-Sponsored Information Warfare Operations by Russian Trolls on Twitter

Social Media Influence Operations

Stop the [Image] Steal: The Role and Dynamics of Visual Content in the 2020 U.S. Election Misinformation Campaign

An Avalanche of Images on Telegram Preceded Russia's Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine

Unmasking the Web of Deceit: Uncovering Coordinated Activity to Expose Information Operations on Twitter

Coordinated Information Campaigns on Social Media: A Multifaceted Framework for Detection and Analysis

Online Coordination: Methods and Comparative Case Studies of Coordinated Groups across Four Events in the United States

Strategies and Vulnerabilities of Participants in Venezuelan Influence Operations

Carthago Delenda Est: Co-opetitive Indirect Information Diffusion Model for Influence Operations on Online Social Media

On the Origins of Memes by Means of Fringe Web Communities

Inductive detection of Influence Operations via Graph Learning

Analyzing image-based political propaganda in referendum campaigns: from elements to strategies

Foreign disinformation operation's affective engagement: Valence versus discrete emotions as drivers of tweet popularity

Coordinated Behavior in Information Operations on Twitter

Examining Similar and Ideologically Correlated Imagery in Online Political Communication

Multifaceted online coordinated behavior in the 2020 US presidential election

Identifying Coordinated Accounts on Social Media through Hidden Influence and Group Behaviours