Abstract:Social media are used as main discussion channels by millions of individuals every day. The content individuals produce in daily social-media-based micro-communications, and the emotions therein expressed, may impact the emotional states of others. A recent experiment performed on Facebook hypothesized that emotions spread online, even in absence of non-verbal cues typical of in-person interactions, and that individuals are more likely to adopt positive or negative emotions if these are over-expressed in their social network. Experiments of this type, however, raise ethical concerns, as they require massive-scale content manipulation with unknown consequences for the individuals therein involved. Here, we study the dynamics of emotional contagion using a random sample of Twitter users, whose activity (and the stimuli they were exposed to) was observed during a week of September 2014. Rather than manipulating content, we devise a null model that discounts some confounding factors (including the effect of emotional contagion). We measure the emotional valence of content the users are exposed to before posting their own tweets. We determine that on average a negative post follows an over-exposure to 4.34% more negative content than baseline, while positive posts occur after an average over-exposure to 4.50% more positive contents. We highlight the presence of a linear relationship between the average emotional valence of the stimuli users are exposed to, and that of the responses they produce. We also identify two different classes of individuals: highly and scarcely susceptible to emotional contagion. Highly susceptible users are significantly less inclined to adopt negative emotions than the scarcely susceptible ones, but equally likely to adopt positive emotions. In general, the likelihood of adopting positive emotions is much greater than that of negative emotions.

Foreign disinformation operation's affective engagement: Valence versus discrete emotions as drivers of tweet popularity

Emotions in Online Content Diffusion

Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media

Emotion diffusion effect: Negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets of public organizations attract more responses from followers

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

Higher contagion and weaker ties mean anger spreads faster than joy in social media

Quantifying the Effect of Sentiment on Information Diffusion in Social Media

Predicting Engagement with the Internet Research Agency's Facebook and Instagram Campaigns around the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Every Word is Valuable: Studied Influence of Negative Words That Spread During Election Period in Social Media.

Impact of emotions in social media content diffusion

Emotions on Twitter as crisis imprint in high-trust societies: Do ambient affiliations affect emotional expression during the pandemic?

Dissecting emotion and user influence in social media communities: An interaction modeling approach

Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election

Information sharing and political polarisation on social media: The role of falsehood and partisanship

Emotional Framing in the Spreading of False and True Claims

Not cool, calm or collected: Using emotional language to detect COVID-19 misinformation

Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?

Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA Influence Campaign

When falsehood wins? Varied effects of sensational elements on users' engagements with real and fake posts

Catching Fire: How National Humiliation Spreads Hostile Foreign Policy Preferences on Chinese Social Media

On the Challenges of Sentiment Analysis for Dynamic Events