Abstract:Aims: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), the coronary flow reserve decreases even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Systolic coronary flow reversal (SFR) reflecting reduced coronary microcirculation, often seen in patients with severe AS, has a potential negative impact on the pathogenesis of cardiac dysfunction. However, there are limited data on the relationship between the severity of AS and SFR, as well as on the benefits of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the severity of AS and efficacy of TAVI in improving SFR. Methods and results: Consecutive patients with AS who had undergone TAVI using transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) from November 2020 to February 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Coronary flow in the left anterior descending artery as well as the aortic valve peak velocities, and the mean aortic valve pressure gradients (AVPGs), indicating the severity of AS, were measured using intraprocedural TEE before and after TAVI. The following parameters were measured as coronary flow: systolic and diastolic peak velocity (cm/s) and systolic and diastolic velocity-time integral (VTI) (cm). SFR was defined as the presence of a reversal coronary flow component in systole. The enrolled patients were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of SFR before TAVI. A total of 25 patients were included: 13 had SFR and 12 who had no SFR, before TAVI. Patients with SFR had significantly higher aortic valve peak velocities (451.1 ± 45.9 vs. 372.1 ± 52.1 cm/s; P < 0.001) and mean AVPGs (49.2 ± 14.5 vs. 30.3 ± 11.6 mmHg; P = 0.002) than those without. The optimal binary cut-off aortic valve peak velocity values and the mean AVPG associated with the presence of SFR before TAVI were >410.0 cm/s (specificity, 75.0%; sensitivity, 92.3%) and >37.4 mmHg (specificity, 83.3%; sensitivity, 92.3%), respectively. After TAVI, SFR immediately disappeared in 11 of 13 patients with SFR (84.6%). Overall, the systolic coronary VTI significantly increased after TAVI (2.0 ± 4.7 vs. 6.4 ± 3.2 cm, P < 0.001), and this increase was greater in patients with SFR than in those without SFR before TAVI (interaction P = 0.035). Conclusions: SFR was found to be associated with the severity of AS and with a greater increase in systolic coronary flow immediately after TAVI.

Natural History of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The Role of Quantitative Flow Ratio

Quantitative flow ratio-based outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation quaestio study

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Neointimal Characteristics in Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for In-Stent Restenosis

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Immediate Angiography Derived Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio after Bioresorbable Scaffold and Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes.

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Value of the Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Long-term Target Vessel Failure in Patients with In-stent Restenosis after Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty

Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Clinical Events after Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with In-Stent Restenosis

Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Therapy: a Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

The Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Survival in Patients with Normal Flow Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: a Propensity-Matched Comparison.

Differential Effect of Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis on Hyperemic and Resting Epicardial Coronary Pressure Indices

Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis

Association between coronary flow and aortic stenosis during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Quantitative flow ratio-guided versus angiography-guided operation for valve disease accompanying coronary heart disease

Preliminary Outcomes of Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Bypass Grafting in Primary Valve Surgery: A Propensity Score Weighted Analysis

Prognostic Impact of Mitral Regurgitation Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Low‐Flow, Low‐Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Implication of QFR in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Predictors of vessel quantitative flow ratio loss in patients with severely calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy

Clinical prognostic value of a novel quantitative flow ratio from a single projection in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the provisional approach.