Abstract:In logical reasoning, it is often the case that only some of a collection of assumptions are needed to reach a conclusion. A strengthening lemma is an assertion that a given conclusion is independent in this sense of a particular assumption. Strengthening lemmas underlie many useful techniques for simplifying proofs in automated and interactive theorem-provers. For example, they underlie a mechanism called subordination that is useful in determining that expressions of a particular type cannot contain objects of another type and in thereby reducing the number of cases to be considered in proving universally quantified statements. This thesis concerns the automation of the proofs of strengthening lemmas in a specification logic called the logic of hereditary Harrop formulas (HOHH). The Abella Proof Assistant embeds this logic in a way that allows it to prove properties of both the logic itself and of specifications written in it. Previous research has articulated a (conservative) algorithm for checking if a claimed strengthening lemma is, in fact, true. We provide here an implementation of this algorithm within the setting of Abella. Moreover, we show how to generate an actual proof of the strengthening lemma in Abella from the information computed by the algorithm; such a proof serves as a more trustworthy certificate of the correctness of the lemma than the algorithm itself. The results of this work have been incorporated into the Abella system in the form of a "tactic command" that can be invoked within the interactive theorem-prover and that will result in an elaboration of a proof of the lemma and its incorporation into the collection of proven facts about a given specification.

Holophrasm: a neural Automated Theorem Prover for higher-order logic

HOList: An Environment for Machine Learning of Higher-Order Theorem Proving

Automated Theorem Proving in Intuitionistic Propositional Logic by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Tableaux for Automated Reasoning in Dependently-Typed Higher-Order Logic (Extended Version)

A Formal Proof of the Expressiveness of Deep Learning

The Mathematical Game

Graph Representations for Higher-Order Logic and Theorem Proving

Automated Theorem Provers Help Improve Large Language Model Reasoning

Premise Selection for Theorem Proving by Deep Graph Embedding

Formalization, Mechanization and Automation of Gödel's Proof of God's Existence

Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Proving

AUTO2, a saturation-based heuristic prover for higher-order logic

Public Announcement Logic in HOL

Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning

DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data

Automating the Proofs of Strengthening Lemmas in the Abella Proof Assistant

A Survey on Deep Learning for Theorem Proving

Automating the Generation of High School Geometry Proofs using Prolog in an Educational Context

The Higher-Order Prover Leo-III (Extended Version)

Proof Automation with Large Language Models