Abstract:With the increase in industrial applications using Answer Set Programming, the need for formal verification tools, particularly for critical applications, has also increased. During the program optimisation process, it would be desirable to have a tool which can automatically verify whether an optimised subprogram can replace the original subprogram. Formally this corresponds to the problem of verifying the strong equivalence of two programs. In order to do so, the translation tool anthem was developed. It can be used in conjunction with an automated theorem prover for classical logic to verify that two programs are strongly equivalent. With the current version of anthem, only the strong equivalence of positive programs with a restricted input language can be verified. This is a result of the translation $\tau^*$ implemented in anthem that produces formulas in the logic of here-and-there, which coincides with classical logic only for positive programs. This thesis extends anthem in order to overcome these limitations. First, the transformation $\sigma^*$ is presented, which transforms formulas from the logic of here-and-there to classical logic. A theorem formalises how $\sigma^*$ can be used to express equivalence in the logic of here-and-there in classical logic. Second, the translation $\tau^*$ is extended to programs containing pools. Another theorem shows how $\sigma^*$ can be combined with $\tau^*$ to express the strong equivalence of two programs in classical logic. With $\sigma^*$ and the extended $\tau^*$, it is possible to express the strong equivalence of logic programs containing negation, simple choices, and pools. Both the extended $\tau^*$ and $\sigma^*$ are implemented in a new version of anthem. Several examples of logic programs containing pools, negation, and simple choice rules, which the new version of anthem can translate to classical logic, are presented. Some a...

AUTO2, a saturation-based heuristic prover for higher-order logic

The Higher-Order Prover Leo-III (Extended Version)

Tableaux for Automated Reasoning in Dependently-Typed Higher-Order Logic (Extended Version)

HOList: An Environment for Machine Learning of Higher-Order Theorem Proving

Holophrasm: a neural Automated Theorem Prover for higher-order logic

Language and Proofs for Higher-Order SMT (Work in Progress)

Automated Theorem Proving in Intuitionistic Propositional Logic by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Automating the Generation of High School Geometry Proofs using Prolog in an Educational Context

Automating Induction by Reflection

Automating Free Logic in HOL, with an Experimental Application in Category Theory

Using Automated Theorem Provers to Teach Knowledge Representation in First-Order Logic

Hybrid: A Definitional Two-Level Approach to Reasoning with Higher-Order Abstract Syntax

AutoSAT: Automatically Optimize SAT Solvers via Large Language Models

Automated Verification of Equivalence Properties in Advanced Logic Programs -- Bachelor Thesis

Automated Theorem Proving via Interacting with Proof Assistants by Dynamic Strategies

Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs

Automating Boolean Set Operations in Mizar Proof Checking with the Aid of an External SAT Solver

Isabelle/HOL as a Meta-Language for Teaching Logic

Formalization, Mechanization and Automation of Gödel's Proof of God's Existence

Program Synthesis in Saturation

Automatic Theorem Proving in Walnut