Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of self-expanding metal stents as a bridge to surgery (the SEMS group)with those of emergency surgery (the ES group)for malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO).Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the 60 cases of MCO that received surgical treatment in Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University and No.413 Hospital from October 2007 to December 2012.The SEMS group (27 cases)received self -expanding metal stents,while the ES group (33 cases)was treated with emergency surgery.Indexes,such as primary anastomotic rate,stoma rate, laparoscopic surgical rate,death rate after surgery,postoperative complication rate,ICU transfer rate,the number of lymph nodes cleared,surgical time,length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost,were compared between the 2 groups. Before surgery, the medical team consisting of multidisciplinary specialists held discussions on the treatment schemes and appropriate surgical protocols were developed pertaining to individual cases.Results Primary anastomotic rate of the patients in the SEMS group (92.6%,25/27)was significantly higher than that of the patients in the ES group (66.7%,22/33)(P=0.015).Stoma rate of the SEMS group (7.4%,2/27)was significantly lower than that of the ES group (45.5%,15/33)(P=0.001).Laparoscopic surgical rate of the SEMS group (14.8%,4/27)was obviously higher than that of the ES group (0%,0/33) (P=0.035).ICU transfer rate of the SEMS group (7.4%,2/27)was significantly lower than that of the ES group (33.3%,11/33)(P=0.015).The number of lymph nodes cleared for the SEMS group(17.52 ± 4.00)was larger than that for the ES group (13.73 ±6.12)(P=0.008).Surgical time for the SEMS group (117.22 ±6.42)min was significantly shorter than that for the ES group (173.64 ±8.32)min (P<0.01). Length of hospital stay for the SEMS group (9 d)was significantly shorter than that for the ES group (14 d) (P<0.01).The median hospitalization cost for the SEMS group (39183.33 RMB)was significantly less than that for the ES group (53675.58 RMB)(P<0.01).Death rate 30 days after surgery and complication rate during perioperative period for the SEMS group [(0%,0/27),(7.4%,2/27)]were lower than those for the ES group [(3.0%,1/33 ),(21.2%,(7/33 )],and no statistical significance could be noted when comparisons were made between them (P<0.05 ).The postoperative morbidity in the SEMS group was lower than that in the ES group (3.0% vs 21.2%),without significant statistical difference (P <0.05 ). Conclusions SEMS could effectively relieve the obstruction caused by colorectal cancer,and change the traditional emergency surgery into a selective surgery with better outcomes.This technique could offer better chances for medical transfer at sea or medical transformation to higher echelon care and seemed to have good promise for further clinical application.

A Post Hoc Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Comparison between metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for malignant large-bowel obstruction

Short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent compared with tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Bridge to Curative Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Self-expandable Metallic Stent Versus Decompression Tube

Oncological Assessment of Stent Placement for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer from Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics

Endoscopic placement of covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction

Palliative Treatment for Incurable Malignant Colorectal Obstructions: A Meta Analysis

A New Self-Expandable Metallic Stent with Low Axial Force and a High Axial Force Zero-Border Shows a Very Low Perforation Rate in Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Japanese Multicenter Prospective Study

Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection: the different endoscopic techniques for colorectal tumors

Re-evaluation of controversial issues in the treatment of cT3N0-2 rectal cancer: a 10-year cohort analysis using propensity-score matching

Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Stenting As a Bridge to Surgery and Emergency Surgery for Acute Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction

Comparison of Safety Between Self-Expanding Metal Stents As a Bridge to Surgery and Emergency Surgery Based on Pathology: a Meta-Analysis

Clinical Study of the Application of Self-Expanding Metal Stents Without Fluoroscopic Monitoring for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Endoscopic Stenting As a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Comparative Study.

Short- and long-term outcomes after colonic self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant large-bowel obstruction as a bridge to surgery focus on the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach: a retrospective, single center study

Comparison of postoperative prognoses for resectable colorectal cancer with vs. without oncologic emergency using propensity score‐matched analyses: A single-center retrospective observational study

Long-term Outcomes and Propensity Score Matching Analysis: Rectal Cancer Resection for Patients with Elevated Preoperative Risk

Self-expandable metallic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for acute malignant right-sided colorectal obstruction

Tu1348 Comparison of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Acute Colorectal Obstruction Caused by Extracolonic Malignancy and Colorectal Cancer

Self-expanding Metal Stents Versus Decompression Tubes As a Bridge to Surgery for Patients with Obstruction Caused by Colorectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Benefits of using a self-expandable metallic stent as a bridge to surgery for right- and left-sided obstructive colorectal cancers