Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of self-expanding metal stents as a bridge to surgery (the SEMS group)with those of emergency surgery (the ES group)for malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO).Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the 60 cases of MCO that received surgical treatment in Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University and No.413 Hospital from October 2007 to December 2012.The SEMS group (27 cases)received self -expanding metal stents,while the ES group (33 cases)was treated with emergency surgery.Indexes,such as primary anastomotic rate,stoma rate, laparoscopic surgical rate,death rate after surgery,postoperative complication rate,ICU transfer rate,the number of lymph nodes cleared,surgical time,length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost,were compared between the 2 groups. Before surgery, the medical team consisting of multidisciplinary specialists held discussions on the treatment schemes and appropriate surgical protocols were developed pertaining to individual cases.Results Primary anastomotic rate of the patients in the SEMS group (92.6%,25/27)was significantly higher than that of the patients in the ES group (66.7%,22/33)(P=0.015).Stoma rate of the SEMS group (7.4%,2/27)was significantly lower than that of the ES group (45.5%,15/33)(P=0.001).Laparoscopic surgical rate of the SEMS group (14.8%,4/27)was obviously higher than that of the ES group (0%,0/33) (P=0.035).ICU transfer rate of the SEMS group (7.4%,2/27)was significantly lower than that of the ES group (33.3%,11/33)(P=0.015).The number of lymph nodes cleared for the SEMS group(17.52 ± 4.00)was larger than that for the ES group (13.73 ±6.12)(P=0.008).Surgical time for the SEMS group (117.22 ±6.42)min was significantly shorter than that for the ES group (173.64 ±8.32)min (P<0.01). Length of hospital stay for the SEMS group (9 d)was significantly shorter than that for the ES group (14 d) (P<0.01).The median hospitalization cost for the SEMS group (39183.33 RMB)was significantly less than that for the ES group (53675.58 RMB)(P<0.01).Death rate 30 days after surgery and complication rate during perioperative period for the SEMS group [(0%,0/27),(7.4%,2/27)]were lower than those for the ES group [(3.0%,1/33 ),(21.2%,(7/33 )],and no statistical significance could be noted when comparisons were made between them (P<0.05 ).The postoperative morbidity in the SEMS group was lower than that in the ES group (3.0% vs 21.2%),without significant statistical difference (P <0.05 ). Conclusions SEMS could effectively relieve the obstruction caused by colorectal cancer,and change the traditional emergency surgery into a selective surgery with better outcomes.This technique could offer better chances for medical transfer at sea or medical transformation to higher echelon care and seemed to have good promise for further clinical application.

A New Self-Expandable Metallic Stent with Low Axial Force and a High Axial Force Zero-Border Shows a Very Low Perforation Rate in Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Japanese Multicenter Prospective Study

Management of acute malignant colorectal obstruction with a novel self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery.

Big End Double-Layer Stents for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Stomach Cancer

Effectiveness of Colonic Stent Placement for Obstructive Colorectal Cancers: an Analysis of Short-Term Results Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.

Colonic Stent Placement May Reduce Mortality Rate and Length of Hospitalization in Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Cases: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis Using a Nationwide Database in Japan

Short- and long-term outcomes after colonic self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant large-bowel obstruction as a bridge to surgery focus on the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach: a retrospective, single center study

Self-expanding metallic stents for acute obstruction of the proximal colorectal cancer

Benefits of using a self-expandable metallic stent as a bridge to surgery for right- and left-sided obstructive colorectal cancers

Self-expanding Metal Stent Insertion by Colorectal Surgeons Using a Two-Person Approach Colonoscopy Without Fluoroscopic Monitoring in the Management of Acute Colorectal Obstruction: a 14-Year Experience

Self-Expandable Metallic Stent As A Bridge to Elective Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery for Acute Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

Colon Metal Stents As a Bridge to Surgery Had No Significant Effects on the Perineural Invasion: a Retrospective Study

Clinical Application of Self-Expanding Metallic Stent in the Management of Acute Left-Sided Colorectal Malignant Obstruction

A Bridge to Curative Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Self-expandable Metallic Stent Versus Decompression Tube

Clinical Study of the Application of Self-Expanding Metal Stents Without Fluoroscopic Monitoring for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

Oncological Assessment of Stent Placement for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer from Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics

Endoscopic Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Insertion without Fluoroscopic Guidance Is Feasible and Safe for Acute Colonic Obstruction Caused by Colorectal Cancer

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Covered and Bare Self-Expandable Metal Stents for the Treatment of Malignant Obstruction in the Digestive Tract.

Challenges associated with low rectal malignant obstruction stenting: a case report

The Safety and Efficiency of Surgery with Colonic Stents in Left-Sided Malignant Colonic Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis

Tu1348 Comparison of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Acute Colorectal Obstruction Caused by Extracolonic Malignancy and Colorectal Cancer

Self-expandable metallic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for acute malignant right-sided colorectal obstruction