Evaluating optimal bilateral biliary stenting in endoscopic reintervention after initial plastic stent dysfunction for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Retrospective cross‐sectional study
Mitsuru Okuno,Keisuke Iwata,Takuji Iwashita,Tsuyoshi Mukai,Kota Shimojo,Yosuke Ohashi,Yuhei Iwasa,Akihiko Senju,Shota Iwata,Ryuichi Tezuka,Hironao Ichikawa,Naoki Mita,Shinya Uemura,Kensaku Yoshida,Akinori Maruta,Eiichi Tomita,Ichiro Yasuda,Masahito Shimizu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14776
2024-03-16
Digestive Endoscopy
Abstract:Objectives The placement of plastic stents (PS), including intraductal PS (IS), is useful in patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) because of patency and ease of endoscopic reintervention (ERI). However, the optimal stent replacement method for PS remains unclear. Methods This retrospective study included 322 patients with UMHBO. Among them, 146 received PS placement as initial drainage (across‐the‐papilla PS [aPS], 54; IS, 92), whereas 75 required ERI. Eight bilateral aPS, 21 bilateral IS, and 17 bilateral self‐expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placements met the inclusion criteria. Rates of technical and clinical success, adverse events, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival, and secondary ERI were compared. Results There were no significant intergroup differences in rates of technical or clinical success, adverse events, RBO occurrence, or overall survival. The median TRBO was significantly shorter in the aPS group (47 days) than IS (91 days; P = 0.0196) and SEMS (143 days; P
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery