Abstract:Purpose Quantification of body composition plays an important role in many clinical and research applications. Radiologic imaging techniques such as Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) imaging make accurate quantification of the body composition possible. However, most current imaging-based methods need human interaction to quantify multiple tissues. When dealing with whole-body images of many subjects, interactive methods become impractical. This paper presents an automated, efficient, accurate, and practical body composition quantification method for low-dose CT images. Method Our method, named automatic anatomy recognition body composition analysis (AAR-BCA), aims to quantify four tissue components in body torso (BT) - subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), bone tissue, and muscle tissue - from CT images of given whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) acquisitions. AAR-BCA consists of three key steps - modeling BT with its ensemble of key objects from a population of patient images, recognition or localization of these objects in a given patient image I, and delineation and quantification of the four tissue components in I guided by the recognized objects. In the first step, from a given set of patient images and the associated delineated objects, a fuzzy anatomy model of the key object ensemble, including anatomic organs, tissue regions, and tissue interfaces, is built where the objects are organized in a hierarchical order. The second step involves recognizing, or finding roughly the location of, each object in any given whole-body image I of a patient following the object hierarchy and guided by the built model. The third step makes use of this fuzzy localization information of the objects and the intensity distributions of the four tissue components, already learned and encoded in the model, to optimally delineate in a fuzzy manner and quantify these components. All parameters in our method are determined from training datasets. Results Thirty-eight low-dose CT images from different subjects are tested in a fivefold cross-validation strategy for evaluating AAR-BCA with a 23-15 train-test dataset division. For BT, over all objects, AAR-BCA achieves a false-positive volume fraction (FPVF) of 3.7% and false-negative volume fraction (FNVF) of 3.8%. Notably, SAT achieves both a FPVF and FNVF under 3%. For bone tissue, it achieves a FPVF and a FNVF both under 3.5%. For VAT tissue, the FNVF of 4.8% is higher than for other objects and so also for muscle (4.7%). The level of accuracy for the four tissue components in individual body subregions mostly remains at the same level as for BT. The processing time required per patient image is under a minute. Conclusions Motivated by applications in cancer and systemic diseases, our goal in this paper was to seek a practical method for body composition quantification which is automated, accurate, and efficient, and works on BT in low-dose CT. The proposed AAR-BCA method toward this goal can quantify four tissue components including SAT, VAT, bone tissue, and muscle tissue in the body torso with under 5% overall error. All needed parameters can be automatically estimated from the training datasets. (c) 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Adjusting for the effect of IV contrast on automated CT body composition measures during the portal venous phase

Effect of Intravenous Contrast on CT Body Composition Measurements in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm

Effect of Patient Factors on Portal Vein and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement at Computed Tomography Scan With Protocol Combining Fixed Injection Duration and Patients’ Body Weight Tailored Dose of Contrast Material

Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue

Quantifying the effect of slice thickness, intravenous contrast and tube current on muscle segmentation: Implications for body composition analysis

Effect of patient characteristics on aortic attenuation in iodinated contrast-enhanced Abdominopelvic CT: A retrospective study

Automated analysis of liver fat, muscle and adipose tissue distribution from CT suitable for large-scale studies

Validation study of a new semi-automated software program for CT body composition analysis

Evaluation of a fully automated computed tomography image segmentation method for fast and accurate body composition measurements

Automated Characterization of Body Composition and Frailty with Clinically Acquired CT.

The impact of imaging time and contrast agent dose on screening for osteoporosis with contrast-enhanced CT

Comparing fully automated AI body composition biomarkers at differing virtual monoenergetic levels using dual-energy CT

Automatic vessel attenuation measurement for quality control of contrast‐enhanced CT: Validation on the portal vein

Fully-automated, high-throughput micro-computed tomography analysis of body composition enables therapeutic efficacy monitoring in preclinical models

Quantification of body‐torso‐wide tissue composition on low‐dose<scp>CT</scp>images via automatic anatomy recognition

Estimating 3‐D whole‐body composition from a chest CT scan

Quantification of body-torso-wide tissue composition on low-dose CT images via Automatic Anatomy Recognition.

Optimizing Arterial Vessel Contrast in Portal Venous Phase with Virtual Monoenergetic Images from Photon-Counting Detector CT Scans of the Abdomen—First Clinical Experiences

Automated extraction of body composition metrics from abdominal CT or MR imaging: A scoping review

Enhanced Muscle and Fat Segmentation for CT-Based Body Composition Analysis: A Comparative Study