Weighted Frac Fluids for Lower-Surface Treating Pressures

Lloyd Simms,Brad Clarkson,Gilbert Navaira,Lloyd Maurice Simms,Brad A. Clarkson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/112531-ms
2008-02-13
Abstract:Abstract With Gulf of Mexico (GOM) hydrocarbon discoveries reaching record depths and very high bottomhole pressures, the need for proven, weighted fracturing stimulation fluids has become urgent. As previous studies have shown, frac packs have a significant impact in maintaining well productivity in the later production life stages of unconsolidated reservoirs. Thus, sustaining the ability to pump frac packs in these challenging environments is a priority. With conventional frac pack fluids, these greater depths and higher bottomhole pressures often would result in the need for surface treating pressures that exceed the limits of current surface equipment and tubulars. Surface treating pressure can be calculated using the equation: (1) Ps*=*BHTP*+*Pfric*-*Phyd Ps = surface pressure BHTP = bottomhole treating pressure Pfrict = friction pressure Phyd = hydrostatic pressure The equation shows that an increase in hydrostatic pressure results in a reduction in surface pressure. This is true as long as any corresponding increases in BHTP and friction pressure remain below the hydrostatic increase. If substantial reductions in surface pressure can be achieved, then frac pack treatments remain a safe and viable option in deepwater and ultra-deepwater environments. As of October 2007, sixteen total jobs have been pumped with a weighted frac pack fluid. Of these jobs, eleven treatments have been pumped by Chevron in the deepwater GOM. This paper presents data from these treatments where substantial reductions in surface treating pressures were observed. Also shown is the accuracy to which surface treating pressures with the weighted frac-pack fluid can be predicted. Introduction To date, Chevron has pumped 11 jobs in deepwater GOM with the weighted frac fluid. Of these wells, the water depths ranged from 4,000 ft to 6,900 ft. For nine of these wells, the measured depth perforated interval ranged from 25,500 ft - 27,000 ft; and the true vertical depth ranged from 23,800 ft - 26,800 ft. Bottomhole pressure ranged from 18,807 psi - 19,890 psi and bottomhole temperature ranged from 190 F - 205 F. The other two wells' intervals ranged from 26,000 ft - 27,500 ft measured depth and true vertical depth. Bottomhole pressure ranged from 19,319 psi - 19,730 psi and bottomhole temperature ranged from 229 F - 235 F. Nine of the jobs were bullheaded with linear gel injected into the formation ahead of cross-linked gel. The other two jobs were spotted down; the tool was shifted; and then the cross-linked gel was injected into the formation. In all the jobs, the bullheading rate varied from 8–12 bpm; and the injection rate varied from 15–45 bpm. The casing size ranged from 7 - 10.25-in. OD across the pay. A tapered workstring, 5–7/8-in., 29.5-lb, S-135 CTM57 / XT57 by 4-in., 14.0-lb, XTM38, was used for the 7-inch completions. A full string of 5–7/8-in., 29.5-lb, S-135 CTM57 / XT57, was used for the 9–7/8-in. and 10.125-in. casing completions. All workstrings were coated with TK-34 internal plastic coating.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?