Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off points for vaginal manometry to differentiate between weak and strong pelvic floor muscle contraction in pregnant women

Bianca Manzan Reis,Jordana Barbosa-Silva,Susan Armijo-Olivo,Patricia Driusso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101115

IF: 4.762

2024-09-08

Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

Abstract:Background Identifying a weak/strong pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction in pregnant women may help prevent and treat dysfunctions during late pregnancy and postpartum. Objective To determine whether the PeritronTM manometer can accurately differentiate a weak from a strong PFM contraction and the respective cut-offs for its variables in pregnant women. Methods This is a diagnostic accuracy study. Forty-four women in the third trimester of pregnancy participated (mean±SD age: 29±5 years). The reference test was vaginal palpation, and the index test was vaginal manometry (PeritronTM manometer). Variables assessed by vaginal manometry were rest, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), MVC average, duration, gradient, area under the curve (AUCm), and contraction speed. The Receiver Operating Curve (AUC/ROC) was used to analyze the data and obtain cut-off points for these variables. Results Perfect discrimination (AUC=1.00) to differentiate between weak/strong PFM contraction in pregnant women was observed for peak MCV (cut-off: 40.56 cmH 2 O). The MVC average showed excellent discriminative ability (AUC=0.96; cut-off: 30.66 cmH 2 O). The gradient variable (AUC=0.85; cut-off: 27.83 cmH 2 O/s) and AUCm (AUC=0.86; cut-off: 1315.6 cm2*s) showed a good discriminative ability. Conclusion The best variables to discriminate between weak/strong PFM contraction in pregnant women using vaginal manometry were peak MVC, MVC average, gradient and AUCm.

rehabilitation,orthopedics