The Role of Personal Demands and Personal Resources in Enhancing Study Engagement and Preventing Study Burnout

Marijntje E. L. Zeijen,Veerle Brenninkmeijer,Maria C. W. Peeters,Nicole J. J. M. Mastenbroek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2024.10
2024-03-09
The Spanish Journal of Psychology
Abstract:Using a 1-year longitudinal design, we examined the role of personal demands and personal resources in long-term health impairment and motivational processes among master students. Based on the job demands-resources theory and transactional model of stress, we hypothesized that students' personal demands (i.e., irrational performance demands, awfulizing and irrational need for control) predict perceived study demands one year later, and indirectly relate to burnout. Furthermore, we predicted that personal resources indirectly associate with study engagement via students' perceived study resources one year later. These hypotheses were tested in a sample of Dutch master students (N = 220 at T1 and T2) using structural equation modelling. As hypothesized, personal demands and personal resources at T1 predicted study demands and study resources one year later (T2, β = .25–.42, p <. 05), respectively. Study-home interference [study demand] mediated the association between personal demands and burnout (β = .08, p = .029), whereas opportunities for development [study resource] mediated the association between personal resources and study engagement (β = .08, p = .014). Hence, personal demands and personal resources relate indirectly to students' burnout and engagement one year later via a heightened level of specific study demands and study resources. Accordingly, the present research expands the propositions of the JD-R Theory by proposing personal demands as a relevant factor for students' long-term well-being.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the roles of personal demands and personal resources in predicting students' academic engagement and preventing academic burnout. Specifically, the author hopes to reveal the following points through research: 1. **The role of Personal Demands**: Personal demands include irrational performance requirements, catastrophizing thinking, and irrational needs for control. How do these factors influence students' perception of future academic pressure and indirectly lead to academic burnout? 2. **The role of Personal Resources**: How do personal resources such as optimism, self - efficacy, and resilience influence students' perception of future academic resources and indirectly promote academic engagement? 3. **The relationship between personal factors and the academic environment**: How do personal demands and personal resources work together to influence students' perception of the academic environment, thereby affecting their mental health levels (i.e., the degree of burnout and the level of engagement)? ### Research Background In recent years, college students' mental health problems have become increasingly serious, especially problems such as depression, fatigue, and burnout. At the same time, students' academic motivation and perfectionism are also on the rise. In order to better understand why some students have mental health problems while others are more actively engaged in learning, this paper combines the Job Demands - Resources (JD - R) Theory and the Transactional Model of Stress to explore the roles of personal demands and personal resources in this process. ### Research Hypotheses Based on the above theoretical framework, the author proposes the following hypotheses: - **Hypothesis 1**: Personal resources at T1 (such as optimism, self - efficacy, and resilience) are positively correlated with the perception of academic resources at T2 (such as feedback, social support, and development opportunities). - **Hypothesis 2**: Personal demands at T1 (such as irrational performance requirements, catastrophizing thinking, and irrational needs for control) are positively correlated with the perception of academic pressure at T2 (such as academic - family conflict, academic pressure, and emotional demands). - **Hypothesis 3**: Personal resources at T1 are indirectly and positively correlated with academic engagement at T2 through the perception of academic resources at T2. - **Hypothesis 4**: Personal demands at T1 are indirectly and positively correlated with academic burnout at T2 through the perception of academic pressure at T2. ### Method The study adopted a one - year longitudinal design and verified the above hypotheses through structural equation modeling analysis of survey data from master's students at a Dutch university. The sample included 220 students who completed questionnaires at two time points (T1 and T2). ### Conclusion The research results show that personal demands and personal resources can indeed indirectly affect students' academic burnout and engagement levels by influencing their perception of the future academic environment. This provides a new perspective for expanding and improving the JD - R theory, especially in considering the impact of personal factors on students' long - term mental health. Through this study, the author hopes to help students and universities better understand and deal with the problem of academic burnout and at the same time promote students' academic engagement.