Parameter Effects on the Total Intensity of H i Ly Line for a Modeled Coronal Mass Ejection and Its Driven Shock

Beili Ying,Guanglu Shi,Li Feng,Lei Lu,Jianchao Xue,Shuting Li,Weiqun Gan,Hui Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02330-x
IF: 2.961
2024-06-27
Solar Physics
Abstract:The combination of the H i Ly (121.6 nm) line formation mechanism with ultraviolet (UV) Ly and white-light (WL) observations provides an effective method for determining the electron temperature of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). A key to ensuring the accuracy of this diagnostic technique is the precise calculation of theoretical Ly intensities. This study performs a modeled CME and its driven shock via the three-dimensional numerical magneto-hydrodynamic simulation. Then, we generate synthetic UV and WL images of the CME and shock within a few solar radii to quantify the impact of different assumptions on the theoretical Ly intensities, such as the incident intensity of the solar chromospheric Ly line ( ), the geometric scattering function ( ), and the kinetic temperature ( ) assumed to be equal to either the proton ( ) or electron ( ) temperature. By comparing differences of the Ly intensities of the CME and shock under these assumptions, we find that: (1) Using the uniform or Carrington maps of the disk Ly emission underestimates the corona Ly intensity (with relative uncertainties below 10%) compared to the synchronic map, except for a slight overestimate (<4%) observed in the partial CME core. The Carrington map yields lower uncertainties than the uniform disk. (2) Neglecting the geometric scattering process has a relatively minor impact on the Ly intensity, with a maximum relative uncertainty of no more than 5%. The Ly intensity is underestimated for the most part but overestimated in the CME core. (3) Compared to the assumption , using leads to more complex relative uncertainties in CME Ly intensity. The CME core and void are both overestimated, with the maximum relative uncertainty in the core exceeding 50% and in the void remaining below 35%. An appropriate increasing proton-to-electron temperature ratio can reduce the uncertainty in the CME core and void. In the CME front, both overestimates and underestimates exist with relative uncertainties of less than 35%. The electron temperature assumption has a smaller impact on the shock, with an underestimated relative uncertainty of less than 20%.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?