Implications of Food Culture and Practice on the Acceptance of Alternative Meat

Natsumi Fujiwara,Masashi Tachikawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031138
IF: 3.9
2024-01-30
Sustainability
Abstract:To investigate the influence of food culture on the acceptability of meat substitutes, in 2023 we conducted a questionnaire survey on men and women aged 18–69 years (N = 1681) in Japan, a country with a food culture that regards soya as a meat substitute, focusing on 'meaning' in the theory of practice. Analysis of three groups—a flexible group who accept foods processed from soya as meat, a strict group who do not accept such foods as meat, and an intermediate group—showed that the flexible group tended to be more positive about the consumption of meat substitutes than the other groups. However, the flexible group was not simply more accepting, as they expressed aversion and anxiety in response to other questions. Food culture, i.e., what is understood to be meat, influences the acceptability of alternative meats. When examining the social acceptability of meat alternatives in the future, it is also important to look at social practices and historical and cultural backgrounds in a multilayered way, in addition to factors that have been emphasized in previous studies, such as consumers' decision-making process.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the impact of food culture on the acceptance of alternative meat. Specifically, the authors conducted a survey to study the attitudes of 1,681 Japanese men and women aged 18 to 69 towards alternative meat, with a focus on the concept of "meaning" in "practice theory." #### Background and Issues 1. **Environmental Sustainability**: With population growth and climate change, environmentally sustainable food consumption (ESFC) has become a key issue. Livestock farming accounts for a significant portion of global greenhouse gas emissions, making it crucial to find new protein sources to replace traditional meat. 2. **Development of Alternative Meat**: Many companies and scholars are exploring and developing alternative meats, such as cultured meat and plant-based meat, which aim to replicate the appearance, texture, and taste of traditional meat. 3. **Social Acceptance**: Although alternative meat is technically feasible, its social acceptance remains controversial. The traditional practice of "eating meat" is seen as a natural, normal, and necessary social practice, while the acceptability of the new practice of "eating alternative meat" requires further research. 4. **Consumer Decision-Making**: Previous studies have mainly focused on the consumer decision-making process, but these studies have failed to fully explain the gap between actual behavior and attitudes. Therefore, this paper uses practice theory to explore how food culture influences the acceptance of alternative meat. #### Research Objectives 1. **Understanding the Impact of Food Culture**: To explore how Japanese food culture, particularly the understanding of soybeans as a meat substitute, influences consumer acceptance of alternative meat. 2. **Categorical Analysis**: To categorize respondents into three groups—flexible group (accepts processed soybean products as meat), strict group (does not accept processed soybean products as meat), and intermediate group—and analyze the attitudes and willingness of different groups towards alternative meat. 3. **Multifaceted Factors**: In addition to the consumer decision-making process, to consider multifaceted factors such as social practices, historical and cultural backgrounds, to comprehensively assess the social acceptance of alternative meat. Through this research, the authors hope to provide a more comprehensive perspective for future assessments of the social acceptance of alternative meat, especially in countries and regions where food culture differs from that of Japan.