Abstract:We provide an experimental investigation of the fair rule preference and its effect on anonymous cooperation, intending to test the hypothesis that people who exhibit high degrees of rule inequality aversion—consider “equality and mutual obligation under the social contract” as justified, are disgusted with free-rider behavior in the public goods game and are more likely to be conditional cooperators and make conditional contributions. Based on experimental work related to rule-preferences Chlaß and Moffatt (Giving in dictator games: experimenter demand effect or preference over the rules of the game? (No. 2012, 044). Jena Economic Research Papers, 2012) and the public goods game Fischbacher et al. (Am Econ Rev 100(1):541–556, 2010), we designed a dictator game with the option of buying a veto (when the veto was purchased, the level of rule inequality decreased, making it an ultimatum game) to measure rule preference, i.e., rule inequality aversion, and conducted a two-stage public goods experiment to identify the cooperation preferences and repeated cooperation levels of participants. We investigated the relationship between rule preferences and cooperative preferences (conditional reciprocal preference) and tried to explain the adjustments people made when making repeated contributions of public goods (conditional cooperation behavior) from a rule preference perspective. The results show that: (1) Heterogeneous rule-inequality-aversion preferences are found in lab; (2) The stronger the rule-inequality-aversion preference is, the higher the probability is for the individual to become a conditional cooperator in public goods experiment; (3) Individuals who have stronger rule-inequality-aversion are more sensitive to the contributions that are deviated from the norm. Compared to the theory of conditional cooperation types, rule-inequality-aversion preference has a better explanation power when it comes to the behavior adjustment in repeated public goods contribution.

Revisiting the impact of impure public goods on consumers’ prosocial behavior: A lab experiment in Shanghai

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Beyond a binary theorizing of prosociality

Rule-Inequality-Aversion Preference and Conditional Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments: Economic Experiment Evidence from China

Psychological Traces of China's Socio-Economic Reforms in the Ultimatum and Dictator Games

Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games

Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game

Group Competition and Personality in an Experimental Public Goods Game

Indirect reciprocity in the public goods game with collective reputations

Institutional Preferences, Social Preferences and Cooperation: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-field Experiment in Rural China

Prosocial Behaviors and the Decomposition of Social Preferences

Social Pressure Mediates the Negative Impact of Guilt on Fair Allocation in Multi-Party Interactions

Self-serving Regret: Experimental Evidence from a Reciprocity Game

The Effect of Sense of Community Responsibility on Residents’ Altruistic Behavior: Evidence from the Dictator Game

Extortion outperforms generosity in iterated Prisoners' Dilemma

The Boundaries of Good Deeds:Public Good Choices in Conflicts between Social Norms and Market Norms-A Study of Students from Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Self-serving reward and punishment: evidence from the laboratory

How to Evaluate One's Behavior Toward ‘bad’ Individuals? Exploring Good Social Norms in Promoting Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Rational conformity behavior in social learning promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game

Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game