Early Clearance of Plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations as a Predictor of Outcome on Osimertinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Exploratory Analysis from AURA3 and FLAURA

Jhanelle E Gray,Myung-Ju Ahn,Geoffrey R Oxnard,Frances A Shepherd,Fumio Imamura,Ying Cheng,Isamu Okamoto,Byoung Chul Cho,Meng-Chih Lin,Yi-Long Wu,Margarita Majem,Oliver Gautschi,Michael Boyer,Krishna C Bulusu,Aleksandra Markovets,J Carl Barrett,Rachel Hodge,Astrid McKeown,Ryan J Hartmaier,Juliann Chmielecki,Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou,Suresh S Ramalingam,Jhanelle E. Gray,Geoffrey R. Oxnard,Frances A. Shepherd,Krishna C. Bulusu,J. Carl. Barrett,Ryan J. Hartmaier,Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou,Suresh S. Ramalingam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3146
IF: 13.801
2023-06-29
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is used for genotyping advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); monitoring dynamic ctDNA changes may be used to predict outcomes. Experimental design: This was a retrospective, exploratory analysis of two phase III trials (AURA3 [NCT02151981], FLAURA [NCT02296125]). All patients had epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (ex19del or L858R; EGFRm) advanced NSCLC; AURA3 also included T790M-positive NSCLC. Osimertinib (FLAURA, AURA3), or comparator EGFR-TKI (gefitinib/erlotinib; FLAURA), or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (AURA3) was given. Plasma EGFRm was analyzed at baseline and Weeks 3/6 by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Outcomes were assessed by detectable/non-detectable baseline plasma EGFRm and plasma EGFRm clearance (non-detection) at Weeks 3/6. Results: In AURA3 (n=291), non-detectable versus detectable baseline plasma EGFRm had longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33–0.68; P<0.0001). In patients with Week 3 clearance versus non-clearance (n=184), respectively, mPFS (months; 95% CI) was 10.9 (8.3–12.6) versus 5.7 (4.1–9.7) with osimertinib and 6.2 (4.0–9.7) versus 4.2 (4.0–5.1) with platinum-pemetrexed. In FLAURA (n=499), mPFS was longer with non-detectable versus detectable baseline plasma EGFRm (HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41–0.70; P<0.0001). For Week 3 clearance versus non-clearance (n=334), respectively, mPFS was 19.8 (15.1 to not calculable) versus 11.3 (9.5–16.5) with osimertinib and 10.8 (9.7–11.1) versus 7.0 (5.6–8.3) with comparator EGFR-TKI. Similar outcomes were observed by Week 6 clearance/non-clearance. Conclusions: Plasma EGFRm analysis as early as 3 weeks on-treatment has the potential to predict outcomes in EGFRm advanced NSCLC.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?