P1.01-19 Predictive and Prognostic Values of Ctdna Clearance in Osimertinib Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort

Y. Song,S. Ma,M. Shi,X. Xu,X. Chen,Y. Wang,Z. Yang,T. Zhang,M. Li,H. Li,L. Zhang,X. Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.734
IF: 20.121
2019-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Although growth advantage of certain clones would ultimately translate into a clinically visible disease progression, radiological imaging does not reflect clonal evolution at the molecular level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), validated as a tool for mutation detection in lung cancer, reflects dynamic molecular changes. Here, we evaluated the potential of ctDNA in monitoring molecular changes and predicting clinical outcomes of EGFR T790M-positive osimertinib treated NSCLC patients. This prospective multicenter study, enrolled 72 T790M positive osimertinib-treated advanced NSCLC patients who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI to evaluate the potential of ctDNA in monitoring, is part of the ongoing ASTRIS study (NCT02474355). Longitudinal plasma samples, collected from 52 patients, were subjected to sequencing using a panel consisting of 168 lung cancer-related genes. Genomic profile prior to the initiation of osimertinib revealed that mutations participating in cell cycle (14 patients, p=0.004) and P53 pathways (43 patients, p=0.032) were associated with shorter OS (p53 was excluded from analysis due to high mutation frequency). Interestingly, patients with undetectable ctDNA at first follow-up (within 50 d, n=41) were correlated with longer PFS (p=0.009) and OS (p=0.022). With a median follow-up of 168 d (ranged from 40 - 550 d), 32 patients experienced radiological disease progression. Among them, 11 (34%) experienced molecular progression reflected by emergency of new mutation or increased allelic frequency of existing mutation prior to radiological progression, with an average leading time of 74 days. Patients with molecular PD prior to radiological PD were more likely to harbor any gene copy number amplification (CNA, p=0.035) and p53 (p=0.023) mutations at radiological PD. In addition, patients with CNA at radiological PD had shorter PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.052). This clinical trial study demonstrates that ctDNA clearance at first follow-up can serve as a predictive and a prognostic marker for patients undergoing osimertinib treatment. Furthermore, it revealed the potential of ctDNA in early detection of disease progression, preceding imaging modalities with an average lead time of 74 days.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?