Abstract:Three groups of Grades 9-10 adolescents were compared across a combination of self-perception and school performance variables (past and present). The three groups studied were (1) students in remedial math and English classes (Remedials), (2) unsuccessful regular-stream students failing three or more subjects (Failures), and (3) successful regular-stream students failing no more than one course (Controls). The sample of 96 students was predominantly female, and subjects were enrolled in a general nonuniversity preparatory program at a commercial high school in an inner-city working-class district. Five sets of measures were used: Self-Perception Measures (Peer, Family, and Academic Self-Concept scales, as well as self-report measures of Study Habits and Educational Aspirations), Current, Past and Follow-up School Performance Measures (academic and nonacademic), and Attribution Measures (student and teacher attributions of reason for failure). Results indicated significant differences between the three groups on several variables. Compared with the Controls, both Remedials and Failures had lower Academic Self-Concepts and lower Reading Levels, but only the Remedials had significantly lower levels of Intellectual Functioning, in addition to lower Math Achievement Levels than the Controls. The Failure group was significantly lower than the other two groups on Family Self-Concept, Attendance, and Overall Grade Percentage (both at the initial and follow-up periods), and they had records showing a higher frequency of elementary school Behavior Problems. Thus it was suggested that school failure was related to emotional difficulties to a significantly greater degree for the Failure group as compared to the Remedial group, which was characterized by more straightforward academic and intellectual deficits. Finally, Failures and Remedials and their teachers tended to attribute the student's failure in particular courses fairly equally to either the student's difficulty in grasping the subject matter, or to insufficient effort, whereas those Controls who were failing a course tended to blame their failure on "Teacher Problems."

Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels

The failure of high ability high schools to deliver academic benefits: The importance of academic self-concept and educational aspirations

The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept: An application of multilevel modelling

Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results

Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well?

The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept.

Relations among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements.

Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik

Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others.

Public, Catholic single-sex, and Catholic coeducational high schools: Their effects on achievement, affect, and behaviors

A comparison of remedial, failure, and successful secondary school students across self-perception and past and present school performance variables

Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self …

It’s Not Only Who You Are but Who You Are With: High School Composition and Individuals’ Attainment Over the Life Course

Within-school social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept.

Big-Fish--Little-Pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools.

Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications

Too Much of a Good Thing Might Be Bad: the Double-Edged Sword of Parental Aspirations and the Adverse Effects of Aspiration-Expectation Gaps

The big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability of social comparison processes over two age cohorts from Western, Asian, and Middle Eastern Islamic countries.

Big fish in little ponds aspire more: mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science.

The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation

The Limitatations of the Interaction Hypothesis in Regard to Ability Grouping