Abstract:Controversy remains around the available choices for the internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. The femoral neck system (FNS) was developed in 2018 and has been widely applied since then as it can provide rigid fixation stability with less damage to the bone mass around the fracture. However, no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of traditional internal fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures.To assess the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of cannulated compression screws (CCS) in the treatment of femoral fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang) were searched from the earliest publication date to December 31, 2021. Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/) was used to check the results and further analyze the related articles. Controlled trials were included if the FNS was applied for the femoral neck fracture in adults and if it was compared with CCS for the achievement of internal fixation. The measurement outcomes included the required operation time, observed patient's blood loss, extent of fracture healing, patient's Harris Hip score (HHS) at the last follow-up, and records of any complications (such as failure of internal fixation, femoral neck shortness, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and delayed union or nonunion).Ten retrospective controlled studies (involving 711 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with CCS, use of the FNS could not decrease the operation time [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98 to 0.22, P = 0.21, I2 = 93%), but it could increase the intraoperative blood loss (SMD: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.15 to 1.03, P = 0.009, I2 = 81%). The pooled results also showed that compared with CCS, the FNS could better promote fracture healing (SMD: -0.97, 95%CI: -1.65 to -0.30, P = 0.005, I2 = 91%), improve the HHS at the last follow-up (SMD: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.21, P = 0.0009, I2 = 84%), and reduce the chances of developing femoral neck shortness (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.14 to 0.61, P = 0.001, I2 = 0%) and delayed union or nonunion (OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30 to 0.73, P = 0.001; I2 = 0%) in adult patients with femoral neck fractures. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the FNS and CCS in terms of failure of internal fixation (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.23 to 1.06, P = 0.07, I2 = 0%) and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (OR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.20 to 1.10, P = 0.08, I2 = 0%).Compared with CCS, the FNS could decrease the chances of developing femoral neck shortness and delayed union or nonunion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Simultaneously, it could accelerate fracture healing and improve the HHS in these patients.

Femoral neck system as a safe alternative to cannulated compression screw and dynamic hip screw in femoral neck fractures: an early comparative study

Comparison of Femoral Neck System to Multiple Cancellous Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients: femoral neck system versus cannulated cancellous screw

Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients

Fixation of adult femoral neck fractures: Retrospective comparison between cannulated screws and femoral neck system (FNS)

Short-term outcomes of femoral neck system versus dynamic hip screws in treatment of femoral neck fractures

Efficacy of the Femoral Neck System in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures

Surgical treatment of non-displaced subcapital hip fracture: Femoral Neck System vs. cannulated screws. Comparative study

Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients

Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Screws for Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Outcomes of Femoral Neck System in Treating Intra-capsular Neck of Femur Fractures in a Young Adult: A Case Report

Comparison of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Preliminary clinical and radiological evaluation of osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS) for subcapital fractures of the femur

Comparison of dynamic compression system versus multiple cancellous screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults

Comparison of young femoral neck fractures treated by femoral neck system, multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws: a retrospectively comparison study

Revision rate of displaced femoral neck fractures in non-elderly adults: a retrospective comparative study of the femoral neck system and cannulated screws

Femoral neck system versus multiple cannulated screws for the fixation of Pauwels classification type II femoral neck fractures in older female patients with low bone mass

Comparative analysis of the femoral neck system (FNS) vs. cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) in the treatment of Middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: clinical outcomes and biomechanical insights

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Internal Fixation Methods Based on Finite Element Analysis for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture

[Study on biomechanical stability in simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by two cannulated screws].