Internet-Based Multi-Agent Architecture for Service Delivery

G. Pour

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients: femoral neck system versus cannulated cancellous screw

Guy Romeo Kenmegne,Chang Zou,Yue Fang,Xuanhong He,Yixiang Lin,Yijie Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06140-3

2023-01-26

Abstract:Background: The fractures of femoral neck account for 50% among hip fractures with around 3%-10% occurring in younger population of below 65 years. The newly introduced FNS as management approach appears to be a potential alternative to the traditional CCS. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and outcome of the femoral neck system (FNS) and the cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adult below 65 years of age. Methods: Data of 114 patients between 18-65 years, admitted in our department for femoral neck fracture from January 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively studied and ranged into two groups based on the surgical methods: FNS group (56 patients) and CCS group (58 patients). The variables of interest including demographic and clinical variables (age, gender, fracture mechanism, injury side and classification), perioperative parameters(operation time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length and hospitalization time), postoperative outcomes and complications (fracture healing time, nonunion rate, femoral neck avascular necrosis, aseptic screw loosening and the Harris Hip Score), were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: All 114 patients presented satisfactory reduction and were followed-up for a period of 12 to 36 months (mean 27 ± 2.07 months); there were no significant differences between both groups in terms of age, gender, fracture classification, side of injury, mechanism of injury, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the hospital length of stay. However, the fracture healing time between FNS group and CCS group was statistically significant (p < 0.05), respectively 2.86 ± 0.77 and 5.10 ± 0.81 months. The significant differences were also found in terms of numbers of fluoroscopies 8.34 ± 1.38 Vs 17.72 ± 2.19, the HHS 87.80 ± 1.92 Vs 84.28 ± 2.24, postoperative complications 8 (14.28%) Vs 26 (44.82) respectively in FNS and CCS group. Conclusion: FNS presented satisfactory outcomes had significantly lower complications rate, therefore, can be one of the alternatives for internal implantation devices in treatment of femoral neck fracture in non-geriatric population.
Short Term Follow-Up after Removal of Internal Fixation after Femoral Neck Fracture Healing in Adults

杨德育,尤瑞金,郑耿阳

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.04.016

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To study the short-term effect on femoral head after removal of femoral neck internal fixation.Methods:From March 2014 to January 2018, 68 cases of adult patients with femoral neck fracture received reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fracture, Among them, 32 cases were treated with removal of femoral neck internal fixation after fracture healing. According to whether the internal fixation was removed, the patients were divided into the removal group(32 cases) and the retention group(36 cases). Two independent samples t test, chi square test, Fisher exact probability method and repeated measurement ANOVA were used to compare the general situation, fracture healing time, femoral head necrosis rate and Harris hip score between the two groups.Results:The follow-up time of the removal group was (31.7±6.8) months. At the last follow-up, the healing rate of the removal group was 21.9%, the incidence of femoral head necrosis was 34.4%. Harris hip score of the removal group before the operation was (12±3); at the last follow-up, the Harris hip score was (84±20). The follow-up time of the retention group was (32.7±7.0)months. At the last follow-up, the incidence of femoral head necrosis of the retention group was 8.3%. The Harris hip score of the retention group before operation was (13±4), and (91± 14)at the last follow-up. The femoral head necrosis rate (t=7.027)and Harris hip score of the retention group(F=7.835) were better than the removal group (both P<0.05).Conclusion:Because of the biomechanical changes, the healing rate of the nail path is low in a short time after the removal of the femoral neck internal fixation, which increases the incidence of femoral head necrosis and leads to the deterioration of hip joint function.
Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients

Huaijian Hu,Jingbo Cheng,Mingli Feng,Zhihua Gao,Jingwei Wu,Shibao Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02517-z

IF: 2.6

2021-06-09

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:Abstract Background The clinical outcome of a new fixation device (femoral neck system, FNS) for femoral neck fractures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate two different internal fixation methods for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients aged under 60 years. Methods We retrospectively studied patients who underwent internal fixation surgery in our hospital for femoral neck fractures between January 2017 and January 2020. Cannulated compression screws (CCS) and FNS groups were divided according to different internal fixation methods. General data (such as sex, age, body mass index, type of fracture) of all patienFemoral neck shorteningts were collected, and joint function was evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) before and 1 year after surgery. We recorded related surgical complications, including femoral head necrosis, nonunion, and femoral neck shortening. Results There were no significant differences in age, sex, or body mass index between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in HHSs between the two groups before surgery. Patients who underwent FNS treatment had longer surgery time (79.75 ± 26.35 min vs. 64.58 ± 18.56 min, p = 0.031) and more blood loss (69.45 ± 50.47 mL vs. 23.71 ± 28.13 mL, p < 0.001). The degree of femoral neck shortening in the FNS group was significantly lower than that in the CCS group (10.0% vs 37.5%, p = 0.036). Regarding postoperative complications, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of femoral head necrosis and fracture nonunion between the two groups. Conclusion Patients younger than 60 with femoral neck fractures can obtain satisfactory clinical results with CCS or FNS treatment. FNS has excellent biomechanical properties and shows significantly higher overall construct stability.

orthopedics
Surgical treatment of non-displaced subcapital hip fracture: Femoral Neck System vs. cannulated screws. Comparative study

P Lalueza-Andreu,Á Martínez-García,P Checa-Betegón,J García-Coiradas,J A Valle-Cruz,F Marco-Martínez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.09.008

2024-10-01

Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of using the Femoral Neck System (FNS) (DePuy Synthes®) versus the use of cannulated screws (CS) in the surgical treatment of non-displaced subcapital hip fractures. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on non-displaced subcapital hip fractures treated with CS or FNS between 2020 and 2023, with a minimum follow-up of one year. A total of 28 patients were included, 14 treated with CS and 14 with FNS. Demographic, radiological, clinical, and functional variables were analyzed. Results: In the CS group, 64% were male, with a mean age of 66.5 years (SD 14.9) and an average follow-up of 22 months (range, 12-36 months). In the FNS group, 57% were male, with a median age of 60.8 years (SD 13.78) and an average follow-up of 16 months (range, 12-24 months). Regarding functional outcomes, no significant differences were found between FNS and CS in the Harris scale: 94.21±11.55 for FNS and 96.50±6.9 for CS (p=0.618). The total postoperative complications (FNS/CS) were 7.1% versus 43%, and implant failure with conversion to total hip replacement was 0% versus 43%, both significantly higher in the CS group (p=0.047; p=0.016, respectively). The FNS also presented a lower rate of avascular necrosis (0% versus 11.1%, p=0.391) and nonunion (0% versus 20%, p=0.163), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Although both treatment methods, cannulated screws and the FNS, showed similar short-term functional outcomes in the management of undisplaced subcapital femoral fractures, the FNS demonstrated a significantly lower rate of complications and reoperations. These results suggest that the FNS could be considered a safer and more effective option compared to cannulated screws.
Toxic action/toxicity

D. Hathway

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00042.x

2000-02-01

Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Abstract:Some six or so physiological systems, essential to normal mammalian life, are involved in poisoning; an intoxication that causes severe injury to any one of them could be life threatening. Reversible chemical reactions showing Scatchard‐type binding are exemplified by CO, CN− and cyclodiene neurotoxin insecticide intoxications, and by antigen‐antibody complex formation. Haemoglobin (Hb) molecular biology accounts for the allosteric co‐operativity and other characteristics of CO poisoning, CN− acts as a powerful cytochrome oxidase inhibitor, and antigen binding in a deep antibody cleft between two domains equipped with epitopes for antigen‐binding groups explains hapten‐specific immune reactions. Covalent chemical reactions with second‐order (SN2) kinetics characterize Hg and Cd poisonings, the reactions of organophosphates and phosphonates with acetylcholinesterase and neurotoxic esterase and the reaction sequence whereby Paraquat accepts electrons and generates superoxide under aerobic conditions. Indirect carcinogens require cytochrome P450 activation to form DNA adducts in target‐organ DNA and cause cancer, but a battery of detoxifying enzymes clustered with the P450 system must be overcome. Thus, Smetabolism competes ineffectively with target DNA for reactive vinyl chloride (VC) metabolites, epoxide hydrolase is important to the metabolism and carcinogenicity of aflatoxins and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (benzo[a]pyrene, etc.), and the non‐toxic 2‐naphthylhydroxylamine N‐glucuronide acts as a transport form in 2‐naphthylamine bladder cancer. VC liver‐cancer pathogenesis is explicable in terms of the presence of the glutathione S‐transferase detoxifying system in hepatocytes and its absence from the fibroblastic elements, and of the VC concentrations reaching the liver by different administrative routes. In VC carcinogenicity, chemical reactions give imidazo‐cyclization products with nucleoside residues of target DNA, and in benzene leukaemia, Z,Z‐muconaldehyde forms cyclic products containing a pyrrole residue linked to purine. Increased HbCO concentrations reduce the O2‐carrying capacity of the blood, and the changed shape of the O2‐Hb dissociation curve parallels disturbance in O2 unloading. CN− acts on electron transport and paralyses respiration. In telodrin poisoning, preconvulsive glutamine formation abstracts tricarboxylic acid intermediates incommensurately with normal cerebral respiration. Antigen‐antibody complexing depletes the antibody titre, available against infection. At high doses of Cd, Cd‐thionein filtered through the kidneys is reabsorbed and tubular lesions produced. Some organophosphate insecticides promote irreversible acetylcholinesterase phosphorylation and blockade nerve function, and others react with neurotoxic esterase to cause delayed neuropathy. The evidence for Paraquat pulmonary poisoning suggests a radical mechanism involving three interrelated cyclic reaction stages. The action of N‐ and O6 (O substituent in 6‐position of the purine) demethylases explains deletion mechanisms for DNA‐alkyl adducts. DNA‐directed synthesis in the presence of ultimate carcinogens provides for an estimation of misincorporations, which implicate the same transversions as those found by direct mutagenicity testing. Chemical carcinogens recognize tissue‐sensitive cells and modify their heritable genetic complement.Oncoproteins encoded by activated oncogenes signal the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells. The importance of the H‐ras oncogene and p53 tumour‐suppressor gene is stressed. Antidotal action is analysed; for example, parenteral glutamine administration to telodrin‐intoxicated rats restores the depleted cerebral glutamate level and prevents seizures. Glutamate acts as anticonvulsant in petit mal epilepsy. In general, therefore, the reaction of the toxicant‐related substance with the relevant target‐tissue macromolecule accounts for the biochemical/biological events at a cellular level and also the symptoms in the living mammal. This mechanism is analogous to mechanisms for diseases such as arthritis and Parkinsonism.
Comparison of Femoral Neck System to Multiple Cancellous Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Xiangyu Xu,Jixing Fan,Fang Zhou,Yang Lv,Yun Tian,Hongquan Ji,Zhishan Zhang,Yan Guo,Zhongwei Yang,Guojin Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.041

IF: 2.687

2023-01-01

Injury

Abstract:Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes of the femoral neck system (FNS) with multiple cancellous screws (MCS) and dynamic hip screws (DHS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 157 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures treated with FNS (from September 2019 to October 2020), MCS, and DHS (from January 2018 to October 2020). According to internal fixation methods, all patients were divided into the FNS group (54 cases), MCS group (51 cases), and DHS group (52 cases). Demographic data were also collected, recorded, and compared, including the follow-up time, days of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times (IFT), weight-bearing time (WBT), length of femoral neck shortening (LFNS), Harris hip score, and complications (such as internal fixation failure, bone nonunion, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head) between the three groups. Results: Overall, 157 patients with a mean age of 61.8 (range, 18-89) years were analyzed. In the FNS group, IFT (median 10.5) was significantly lower than that in the MCS group (median 21) and DHS group (median 20.5) (P<0.05), and WBT was significantly earlier than that of the MCS group (P<0.05). In the FNS group, the median hospitalization time, operation time, and blood loss were 2 (2, 4) days, 45 (40-59) min, and 30 (20, 50) ml, respectively. They were all significantly less than 3.5 (3, 6) days, 72 (55-88.75) min, and 50 (30, 50) ml in the DHS group, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in LFNS, quality of reduction, internal fixation failure rate, and Harris hip score at the latest follow-up (P>0.05). No surgical complications such as incision infection, deep infection, pulmonary embolism, or femoral head necrosis were found in any of the three groups. Conclusion: FNS, MCS, and DHS are all effective for femoral neck fractures. However, a lower IFT of FNS shortens the operation time. Compared to MCS, FNS has the advantages of being a simple operation, with early WBT; compared to DHS, a minimally invasive operation is the main advantage of FNS. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Efficacy of the Femoral Neck System in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhi‐Ying Wu,Zi-Heng Luo,Liu-Chao Hu,Yiwen Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11454

2022-01-01

World Journal of Clinical Cases

Abstract:Controversy remains around the available choices for the internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. The femoral neck system (FNS) was developed in 2018 and has been widely applied since then as it can provide rigid fixation stability with less damage to the bone mass around the fracture. However, no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of traditional internal fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures.To assess the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of cannulated compression screws (CCS) in the treatment of femoral fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang) were searched from the earliest publication date to December 31, 2021. Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/) was used to check the results and further analyze the related articles. Controlled trials were included if the FNS was applied for the femoral neck fracture in adults and if it was compared with CCS for the achievement of internal fixation. The measurement outcomes included the required operation time, observed patient's blood loss, extent of fracture healing, patient's Harris Hip score (HHS) at the last follow-up, and records of any complications (such as failure of internal fixation, femoral neck shortness, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and delayed union or nonunion).Ten retrospective controlled studies (involving 711 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with CCS, use of the FNS could not decrease the operation time [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98 to 0.22, P = 0.21, I2 = 93%), but it could increase the intraoperative blood loss (SMD: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.15 to 1.03, P = 0.009, I2 = 81%). The pooled results also showed that compared with CCS, the FNS could better promote fracture healing (SMD: -0.97, 95%CI: -1.65 to -0.30, P = 0.005, I2 = 91%), improve the HHS at the last follow-up (SMD: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.21, P = 0.0009, I2 = 84%), and reduce the chances of developing femoral neck shortness (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.14 to 0.61, P = 0.001, I2 = 0%) and delayed union or nonunion (OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30 to 0.73, P = 0.001; I2 = 0%) in adult patients with femoral neck fractures. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the FNS and CCS in terms of failure of internal fixation (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.23 to 1.06, P = 0.07, I2 = 0%) and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (OR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.20 to 1.10, P = 0.08, I2 = 0%).Compared with CCS, the FNS could decrease the chances of developing femoral neck shortness and delayed union or nonunion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Simultaneously, it could accelerate fracture healing and improve the HHS in these patients.
Femoral neck system as a safe alternative to cannulated compression screw and dynamic hip screw in femoral neck fractures: an early comparative study

Zhe Zheng Clyde Lim,Cheryl Marise Peilin Tan,Rex Premchand Antony Xavier,Michael Gui Jie Yam,Ivan Tjun Huat Chua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2022-024

2024-01-08

Singapore Medical Journal

Abstract:Abstract Introduction: The femoral neck system (FNS) is a safe alternative to cannulated compression screw (CCS) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in femoral neck fractures. Methods: A dual-centre retrospective cohort study was performed on femoral neck fractures (AO type 31-B) treated with closed reduction and internal fixation using FNS, DHS or CCS between April 2016 and April 2020. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged below 16 years; chronic fractures beyond 7 days; pathological fractures; fracture extension to the intertrochanteric region or ipsilateral neck and shaft fractures; and open fractures. A total of 85 patients were identified: FNS ( n = 28), DHS ( n = 29) and CCS ( n = 28). Results: The FNS and CCS groups had a lower Garden and Pauwels classification compared to the DHS group (both P < 0.001). Both FNS and CCS groups were comparable in postoperative orthopaedic complications (10.7% [ n = 3] vs. 3.6% [ n = 1], adjusted P = 0.321). The DHS group had more postoperative orthopaedic complications than the FNS group, but this was not statistically significant (27.6% [ n = 8] vs. 10.7% [ n = 3], adjusted P = 0.321). There were no significant differences in median time to radiological union or median femoral neck shortening at union (both P > 0.05) among the three groups. Conclusion: The new DePuy Synthes FNS is a safe alternative to CCS with comparable complication rates for femoral neck fractures that are less displaced and more stable. The FNS also appears to be a safe alternative to DHS in the fixation of femoral neck fractures for the few cases of high-energy femoral neck fractures.

medicine, general & internal
Short-term outcomes of femoral neck system versus dynamic hip screws in treatment of femoral neck fractures

杨钟玮,张志山,吕扬,郭琰,田耘,周方,许翔宇,姬洪全,侯国进

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210702-00319

2021-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To compare the short-term outcomes of femoral neck system (FNS) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed of the 105 patients with fresh femoral neck fracture who had been treated by FNS fixation from September 2019 to October 2020 or by DHS fixation from January 2018 to October 2020 at Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Peking University. In the FNS group of 54 cases, there were 18 males and 36 females with a mean age of (60.7±15.2) years; in the DHS group of 51 cases, there were 14 males and 37 females with a mean age of (63.3±13.2) years. The 2 groups were compared in terms of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, qualify of reduction, and femoral neck shortening length, Harris hip score and complications at the last follow-up.Results:The 2 groups were comparable due to insignificant differences in their preoperative general data or follow-up time ( P>0.05). In the FNS group, the median operation time [45.0 (40.0, 59.0) min], intraoperative blood loss [30.0 (20.0, 50.0) mL], incision length [4.0 (4.0, 5.0) cm], intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency [10.5 (9.0, 12.0) times] and hospital stay [2.0 (2.0, 4.0) d] were significantly superior to those in the DHS group [72.0 (55.0, 89.0) min, 50.0 (30.0, 50.0) mL, 7.0 (6.0, 8.0) cm, 18.0 (15.0, 19.0) times, and 3.0 (3.0, 6.0) d] (all P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in quality of reduction, length of femoral neck shortening, failure rate of internal fixation or Harris hip score at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). There were no such surgical complications as deep infection or femoral head necrosis in either of the 2 groups. Conclusions:In the fixation of femoral neck fractures, both FNS and DHS may lead to fine short-term outcomes. However, compared with DHS, FNS exhibits advantages of simplicity, minimal invasion, less surgical trauma and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and reduced operation time and hospital stay.
Fairness-based dynamic traffic grooming in WDM mesh networks

Rongxi He,Haibo Wen,Lemin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2004.1391785

2004-08-29

Abstract:Under the constraints of the number of transceivers per node and wavelength continuity, the fairness issue of connections with different bandwidth granularities in traffic-grooming WDM mesh networks is investigated. Based on an auxiliary graph model, two fairness-based dynamic grooming algorithms are proposed. We evaluate the performance of our schemes via simulations. The results show that they provide good fairness while at the same time ensure a small increase in the overall traffic blocking probability.
Non-sliding Fixation Shows Improved Clinical Outcomes for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures As Compared to Sliding Fixation.

Xiangyu Xu,Yang Lv,Zengzhen Cui,Jixing Fan,Fang Zhou,Yun Tian,Hongquan Ji,Zhishan Zhang,Yan Guo,Zhongwei Yang,Guojin Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.826159

IF: 1.8

2022-01-01

Frontiers in Surgery

Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes between use of sliding fixation (three cannulated screws, TCS) and non-sliding fixation (four cannulated screws, FCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures treated with TCS (60 cases) and FCS (42 cases) between January, 2018 and December, 2019. The demographic data, follow-up time, hospitalization time, operation time, blood loss, length of femoral neck shortening (LFNS), soft tissue irritation of the thigh (STIT), Harris hip score, and complications (such as internal fixation failure, non-union, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head) were also collected, recorded, and compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 102 patients with an average age of 60.9 (range, 18-86) years were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 25 (22 to 32) months. The LFNS in the FCS group (median 1.2 mm) was significantly lower than that in the TCS group (median 2.8 mm) (P < 0.05). In the Garden classification, the number of displaced fractures in the TCS group was significantly lower than that in the FCS group (P < 0.05). The median hospitalization time, operation time, blood loss, reduction quality, internal fixation failure rate (IFFR), STIT, and Harris hip score were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, in the subgroup analysis of displaced fractures, the LFNS (median 1.2 mm), STIT (2/22, 13.6%), and Harris hip score (median 91.5) of the FCS group at the last follow-up were significantly better than the LFNS (median 5.7 mm), STIT (7/16, 43.8%), and Harris hip score (median 89) of the TCS group (P < 0.05). No complications such as incision infection, deep infection, pulmonary embolism, or femoral head necrosis were found in either group. ConclusionTCS and FCS are effective for treating femoral neck fractures. For non-displaced fractures, there was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. However, for displaced fractures, the LFNS of the FCS is significantly lower than that of the TCS, which may reduce the occurrence of STIT and improve the Harris hip score.
Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Screws for Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yao Lu,Zhilong Huang,Yibo Xu,Qiang Huang,Cheng Ren,Ming Li,Zhong Li,Liang Sun,Xue Han⊗,Kun Zhang,Qian Wang,Teng Ma

2022-01-01

Abstract:Femoral neck fracture treatment in young adults remains controversial. Cannulated screws (CS) and femoral neck system (FNS) are well-accepted methods for femoral neck fracture treatment; however, these methods are associated with complications. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relative safety and effectiveness of CS and FNS for treating young patients with femoral neck fractures.We searched the following sources for studies that compared CS and FNS fixation: Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine disc, and Chinese Science and Technology Journals. The outcomes were surgical and prognostic results and complications.This meta-analysis included eight studies. The pooled results revealed that the two fixation methods were similar in terms of the operation time, length of hospital stay, healing time, intraoperative blood loss, non-union, femoral head necrosis, and internal fixation cut-out. Compared with CS fixation, FNS fixation required fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies and had better Harris Hip Score, earlier weight-bearing, lower number of total complications, lesser femoral neck shortening, and lesser extent of nail retreat.FNS fixation outperforms CS fixation in terms of intraoperative fluoroscopies, Harris Hip Score, and morbidity in young patients with femoral neck fractures. Clinicians should consider FNS as a first choice in treating femoral neck fracture in young adults, except where this approach is contraindicated.
Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures

Haisen Hong,Mo Sha,Zhangxin Chen,Yanwei Li,Liangqi Kang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-231547

IF: 1.6

2024-07-20

Technology and Health Care

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures, which are fractures occurring from the femoral head to the base of the femoral neck, are prevalent in the elderly population. With the progression of societal aging, the incidence of femoral neck fractures has been steadily increasing, making it a significant global issue that urgently needs to be addressed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of dynamic hip screw (DHS) with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system (FNS) internal fixation for the treatment of Garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A total of 90 patients with Garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures were randomly assigned to either the control group (n= 45) treated with DHS and anti-rotation screw or the experimental group (n= 45) treated with FNS. Surgical outcomes, including incision size, blood loss, operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, and fracture healing time, were compared. Postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, Harris scores, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also assessed. RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated significantly reduced incision length, blood loss, operation time, and fluoroscopy frequency compared to the control group (P 0.05). At 6 months post-treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in Harris scores and VAS scores compared to pre-treatment (P 0.05). The rates of internal fixation failure, nonunion, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, as well as overall incidence of postoperative complications and reoperation rates, showed no significant differences between the two groups (P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both DHS with anti-rotation screw and FNS internal fixation demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of Garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures. The experimental group showed advantages in terms of reduced incision length, blood loss, operation time, and fluoroscopy frequency, while maintaining similar clinical outcomes and complication rates.

engineering, biomedical,health care sciences & services
Tenth anniversary perspectives on AIDS. HIV: between past and future.

G. Myers

AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

Abstract:
[Study on biomechanical stability in simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by two cannulated screws].

Xiao-Jun He,Hong-Wei Xu,Kang Ji,Zhong-Wei Zhang,Shi-Gui Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.11.005

2016-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the stability of internal fixation for femoral neck fracture(FNF) using two or three cannulated screws directed to different fracture lines, and to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical decision making. METHODS:Fifteen fresh frozen human femur samples were selected and the FNF model was established with Pauwels angle of 30°, 50° and 70° respectively. The models were fixed with three or two cannulated screws, and their differences at tensile strength, subsidence, shear strength and composite displacement, gap distance, torsional angle and stiffness values of four types of femur were evaluated to identify their biomechanical stability. RESULTS:With Pauwels angle of 30° and 50°, no statistical differences at the referenced outcomes were observed between two and three cannulated screw fixation for FNF(P>0.05). With the Pauwels angle of 70 °, three cannulated screws fixation were significantly superior to two cannulated screws fixation for FNF(P<0.05). Nevertheless, when Pauwels angle was 70°, three cannulated screws fixation turned out to be relative instable compared with Pauwels angle of 30° and 50°. CONCLUSIONS:With Pauwels angle of 30° and 50°, two cannulated screws fixation was similarly stable as using three cannulated screws for FNF. Three cannulated screws fixation were obviously superior to two cannulated screws fixation when Pauwels angle was 70°, but the application of three cannulated screws could still be insufficiently stable when only such routine fixations were utilized. Therefore, Angle Stabilizing System or anti-sliding screws were needed to enhance the stability of FNF fixation.
Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients

Jae Youn Yoon,Seong-Eun Byun,Young-Ho Cho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07113-2

IF: 2.562

2024-01-02

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Abstract Backgrounds This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in patients treated with a femoral neck system (FNS, DePuy Synthes), which is a recently introduced device. Methods This retrospective cohort study of 43 patients who underwent osteosynthesis using FNS for FNF between July 2019 and June 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The researchers examined the patients’ demographic factors and radiologically evaluated the fracture type and fixation status, bone union, and postoperative complications. Results Of 43 patients, 25 were female, and the patients’ mean age and body mass index were 62.1 years and 22.5 kg/m 2 , respectively. According to the Association of Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the most common fracture types were 31B1.1 and B1.2 (13 cases each), followed by B2.3, B2.1, and B2.2 (seven, five, and four cases, respectively). Radiological bone union was confirmed in 39 patients (90.7%), and the mean time to union was 3.6 months. Two cases of nonunion, one case of lag screw cut-out, and one case of osteonecrosis were confirmed; all four cases later underwent arthroplasty. The mean time to reoperation was 4.5 months. Meanwhile, five patients underwent implant removal after the bone union, and distal locking screw stripping was noted in three patients. All three patients required metal plate cutting to remove the implants. Conclusions Osteosynthesis of FNF using the newly introduced FNS showed favorable clinical outcomes and no specific hardware-related complications were reported during the follow-up. However, attention must be paid to the issue regarding distal locking screw failure during hardware removal.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Comparison of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Xinzhao Zhang,Changling Zheng,Jin Huang,Hui Chen,Jie Lei,Cong Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34582

IF: 3.776

2024-07-16

Heliyon

Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of three different fixation methods in treating femoral neck fractures in young patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 young patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent surgical treatment. Among them, 16, 12, and 7 patients underwent fixation with three cannulated compression screws (3CS), the femoral neck system (FNS), and the compound compression system (CCS), respectively. Data, including fracture classification, injury-to-surgery time, surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy instances, fracture healing time, complications, and Harris score at the final follow-up, were collected and analyzed to compare clinical outcomes among the three fixation methods. Results: All patients were followed for at least 6 months, exhibiting no significant differences in age, gender, injury side, fracture type, or injury-to-operation time among the three groups (P > 0.05). The FNS and CCS groups exhibited shorter operation durations and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy instances compared to the 3CS group (P < 0.01). Despite the minimally invasive nature of 3CS, the FNS and CCS groups experienced higher intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01). During follow-up, only one patient with 3CS fixation developed nonunion. Additionally, patients treated with 3CS demonstrated a higher incidence of femoral head necrosis and severe femoral neck shortening than the FNS and CCS groups. Excluding patients with combined nonunion, no significant difference in mean fracture healing time was observed among the three groups (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the FNS and CCS groups showed higher Harris scores (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Both FNS and CCS are effective internal fixation systems for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young patients, yielding more satisfactory clinical functional outcomes than 3CS. Comparatively, the CCS system presents a higher risk of iatrogenic rotation of the proximal fracture segment. Therefore, we advocate the insertion of two to three 2.5 mm Kirschner wires from the upper edge of the femoral neck along the axial direction before CCS lag screw insertion to resist iatrogenic rotational stress.
Comparison Between Headless Cannulated Screws and Partially Threaded Screws in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Yilin Wang,Na Han,Dianying Zhang,Peixun Zhang,Baoguo Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03494-3

IF: 4.6

2022-01-01

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The choices of the treatments for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognoses of the variable pitch fully threaded headless cannulated screws (HCS) in the fixation of femoral neck fractures and to compare them with those of partially threaded cannulated screws (PCS). Between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016, there were 89 patients with the main diagnose of FNF who accepted the treatment of closed reduction cannulated screw fixation in Peking University People’s Hospital. 34 cases of PCS and 23 cases of HCS met the criterion. The characteristics, prognoses and the imaging changes of all cases were described and the differences between the two groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Mann–Whitney U test, Analysis of Variance and Chi-square test were used. Statistical significance was defined as P value (two sided) less than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the general characteristics, fracture classifications and reduction quality between the two groups. HCS group had a significant lower angle decrease rate (30.4% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.035), femoral neck shortening rate (26.1% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.044) and screw back-sliding rate (21.7% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.032), but a higher screw cut-out rate (21.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.008). In non-displacement fracture subgroup, HCS had significant higher Harris Score (92 vs. 90, P = 0.048). Compared with PCS, HCS had a lower screw back-sliding rate, femoral shortening rate, angle decrease rate and similar function score, but would result in more screw cut-outs in displaced FNF. As a conclusion, HCS should not be used in displaced FNF due to its higher screw cut-out rate, and its potential advantage in non-displaced FNF needs to be further proved. Further qualified investigations with a larger scale of patients and longer follow-up are needed in the future.
Mechanical analysis of modified femoral neck system in the treatment of osteoporotic femoral neck fractures

Chong Nan,Yuxiu Liu,Di Zhang,Yazhuo Qin,Hetong Yu,Yong Liu,Zhanbei Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07907-y

IF: 2.562

2024-10-06

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Despite the explicit biomechanical advantages associated with FNS, it is currently inconclusive, based on the existing literature, whether Femoral Neck System (FNS) outperforms Cannulated cancellous screws (CSS) in all aspects. Due to variances in bone morphology and bone density between the elderly and young cohorts, additional research is warranted to ascertain whether the benefits of FNS remain applicable to elderly osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of FNS in osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and propose optimization strategies including additional anti-rotation screw.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Comparison of Femoral Neck Internal Fixation System and Simple Cannulated Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients under 65 Years Old

Zhao Jun,Chen Changsheng,Xu Zhonghua,Chen Hongfeng,Zhang Feng,Wang Qiuping,Zhou Jinlong,Que Yunduan

2023-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: For many years, the choice of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures in young adults has been controversial. No matter what treatment is chosen, the goal is the anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation. Although there are many internal fixation methods for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults, the therapeutic effects have their advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified treatment plan at present.OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of a new type of femoral neck internal fixation system in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2020, the relevant data of 21 patients with femoral neck fractures fixed by femoral neck internal fixation system（observation group） and 32 patients with femoral neck fractures fixed by three hollow nails（control group） were included in this study. The patient age was ≤ 65 years old. All patients had closed fractures. All patients underwent anteroposterior radiography of the affected side before the operation, and all patients underwent a CT plain scan plus three-dimensional reconstruction. Fracture healing and necrosis of the femoral head were evaluated by X-ray film of the hip joint after the operation. MRI examination was performed in some cases when necessary. The hip function was assessed at the last follow-up. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:（1） All 21 patients in the observation group were followed up for an average of 19 months. The average operation time was 58.09 minutes. The average number of fluoroscopy was 23.19 times. The average intraoperative blood loss was 109.29 mL. The average clinical healing time was 3.86 months. The mean time of complete weight bearing after the operation was 6 months. The complication rate was 14.3%. The excellent and good rate of hip joint function was 85.7%.（2） In the control group, 32 patients were followed up for an average of 18 months. The average operation time was 74.06 minutes. The average number of fluoroscopy was 33.41 times. The average intraoperative blood loss was 81.56 mL. The average clinical healing time was 4.69 months. The mean time of complete weight bearing after the operation was 6.72 months. The complication rate was 28.1%. The rate of excellent and good hip function was 71.9%.（3） The results show that compared with the simple cannulated screw internal fixation, the femoral neck internal fixation system can shorten the operation time and clinical healing time of patients with femoral neck fractures under 65 years old, and reduce the frequency of fluoroscopy.

Internet-Based Multi-Agent Architecture for Service Delivery

Femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients: femoral neck system versus cannulated cancellous screw

Short Term Follow-Up after Removal of Internal Fixation after Femoral Neck Fracture Healing in Adults

Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients

Surgical treatment of non-displaced subcapital hip fracture: Femoral Neck System vs. cannulated screws. Comparative study

Toxic action/toxicity

Comparison of Femoral Neck System to Multiple Cancellous Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Efficacy of the Femoral Neck System in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Femoral neck system as a safe alternative to cannulated compression screw and dynamic hip screw in femoral neck fractures: an early comparative study

Short-term outcomes of femoral neck system versus dynamic hip screws in treatment of femoral neck fractures

Fairness-based dynamic traffic grooming in WDM mesh networks

Non-sliding Fixation Shows Improved Clinical Outcomes for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures As Compared to Sliding Fixation.

Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Screws for Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures

Tenth anniversary perspectives on AIDS. HIV: between past and future.

[Study on biomechanical stability in simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by two cannulated screws].

Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients

Comparison of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Comparison Between Headless Cannulated Screws and Partially Threaded Screws in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Mechanical analysis of modified femoral neck system in the treatment of osteoporotic femoral neck fractures

Comparison of Femoral Neck Internal Fixation System and Simple Cannulated Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients under 65 Years Old