Abstract:In diagnostic accuracy studies, the contrast of interest can be one of the following: one single test contrast; comparing two or more single tests; further testing in addition to previous diagnostics; and comparing alternative diagnostic strategies. The clinical diagnostic problem under study must be specified. Studies of "extreme contrasts" (as early phase evaluations) and studies in "clinical practice" settings (assessing clinical value) should be distinguished. Design options are (1) survey of the total study population, (2) case-referent approach, or (3) test-based enrollment. Data collection should generally be prospective, but ambispective and retrospective approaches are sometimes appropriate. In addition to determinants of primary interest [the test(s) under study] possible modifiers of test accuracy and confounding variables must be specified. The reference standard procedure should be independent from the test results. Applying a reference standard can be difficult in case of classification errors, lack of a clear pathophysiologic concept, incorporation bias, or invasive or complex investigations. Possible solutions are: an independent expert panel, and the delayed type cross-sectional study (clinical follow-up). Also, a prognostic criterion can be chosen. For studies to be relevant for practice, inclusion criteria must be based on "intention to diagnose" or "intention to screen." The recruitment procedure is preferably a consecutive series of presenting patients or a target population screening, respectively. Sample size estimation should be routine. Analysis has to be focused on the contrast of interest. Estimating test accuracy and prediction of outcome need different approaches. External (clinical) validation requires repeated studies in other, similar populations. Also, systematic reviews and meta-analysis have a role. To enable readers of diagnostic research reports to evaluate whether methodological key issues were addressed, authors are advised to follow the STARD guidelines.

Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests

Statistical Methods for Comparing Predictive Values in Medical Diagnosis

Statistics in diagnostic medicine

Medical diagnostic accuracy measures: an innovative approach based on the area under predictive values curves

Statistical inference for diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple comparisons

Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study

Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update

Statistical methods for medical studies

Optimization of functional diagnostic test: the effect of kernel method as an estimator of ROC curve

Healthcare Processes of Laboratory Tests for the Prediction of Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit: a Retrospective Study Based on Electronic Healthcare Records in the USA.

Decision Curve Analysis: a Technical Note

A multiple testing framework for diagnostic accuracy studies with co-primary endpoints

Biostatistics in clinical decision making for cardiothoracic radiologists

Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians

Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs

Chapter 9: Options for Summarizing Medical Test Performance in the Absence of a “Gold Standard”

Aggregating multiple test results to improve medical decision-making

Measures of Performance and Clinical Superiority Thresholds for 'Test-and-treat' Predictive Biomarkers

Statistical Evaluation of a Biomarker

Different view of the diagnostics test accuracy measures and optimal cut-off point selection procedure under tree or umbrella ordering

Testing practical relevance of treatment effects