Abstract:Multivariable analysis of clinical and exercise test data has the potential to become a useful tool for assisting in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, assessing prognosis, and reducing the cost of evaluating patients with suspected coronary disease. Since general practitioners are functioning as gatekeepers and decide which patients must be referred to the cardiologist, they need to use the basic tools they have available (i.e. history, physical examination and the exercise test), in an optimal fashion. Scores derived from multivariable statistical techniques considering clinical and exercise data have demonstrated superior discriminating power compared with simple classification of the ST response. In addition, by stratifying patients as to probability of disease and prognosis, they provide a management strategy. While computers, as part of information management systems, can run complicated equations and derive these scores, physicians are reluctant to trust them. Thus, these scores have been represented as nomograms or simple additive tables so physicians are comfortable with their application. Their results have also been compared with physician judgment and found to estimate the presence of coronary disease and prognosis as well as expert cardiologists and often better than nonspecialists. However, the discriminating power of specific variables from the medical history and exercise test remains unclear because of inadequate study design and differences in study populations. Should expired gases be substituted for estimated metabolic equivalents (METs)? Should ST/heart rate (HR) index be used instead of putting these measurements separately into the models? Should right-sided chest leads and HR in recovery be considered? There is a need for further evaluation of these routinely obtained variables to improve the accuracy of prediction algorithms especially in women. The portability and reliability of these equations must be demonstrated since access to specialised care must be safe-guarded. Hopefully, sequential assessment of the clinical and exercise test data and application of the newer generation of multivariable equations can empower the clinician to assure the cardiac patient access to appropriate and cost-effective cardiological care.

Biostatistics in clinical decision making for cardiothoracic radiologists

Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians

The basic statistical concepts and their interrelationships in diagnostic research

Understanding decision curve analysis in clinical prediction model research

Nonparametric ROC Summary Statistics for Correlated Diagnostic Marker Data

ROC curve analysis: a useful statistic multi-tool in the research of nephrology

Decision Curve Analysis: a Technical Note

Between a ROC and a Hard Place: Using prevalence plots to understand the likely real world performance of biomarkers in the clinic

Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests

Statistics in diagnostic medicine

Radiomics in Cardiac Computed Tomography

A Non-Parametric Method for the Comparison of Partial Areas under ROC Curves and Its Application to Large Health Care Data Sets.

Assessing patients with possible heart disease using scores

What is an ROC curve?

RECIST 1.1 assessments variability: a systematic pictorial review of blinded double reads

Statistical methods for MRMC ROC studies.

The ins and outs of errors in oncology imaging: the DAC framework for radiologists

Radiogenomics and Artificial Intelligence Approaches Applied to Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review

Statistical Methods for Comparing Predictive Values in Medical Diagnosis

Advancing Diagnostics and Patient Care: The Role of Biomarkers in Radiology

Assessment of the comparative agreement between chest radiographs and CT scans in intensive care units