Abstract:Low-frequency surface electromagnetic prospecting methods have been gaining a lot of interest because of their capabilities to directly detect hydrocarbon reservoirs and to compliment seismic measurements for geophysical exploration applications. There are two types of surface electromagnetic surveys. The first is an active measurement where we use an electric dipole source towed by a ship over an array of seafloor receivers. This measurement is called the controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method. The second is the Magnetotelluric (MT) method driven by natural sources. This passive measurement also uses an array of seafloor receivers. Both surface electromagnetic methods measure electric and magnetic field vectors. In order to extract maximal information from these CSEM and MT data we employ a nonlinear inversion approach in their interpretation. We present two types of inversion approaches. The first approach is the so-called pixel-based inversion (PBI) algorithm. In this approach the investigation domain is subdivided into pixels, and by using an optimization process the conductivity distribution inside the domain is reconstructed. The optimization process uses the Gauss–Newton minimization scheme augmented with various forms of regularization. To automate the algorithm, the regularization term is incorporated using a multiplicative cost function. This PBI approach has demonstrated its ability to retrieve reasonably good conductivity images. However, the reconstructed boundaries and conductivity values of the imaged anomalies are usually not quantitatively resolved. Nevertheless, the PBI approach can provide useful information on the location, the shape and the conductivity of the hydrocarbon reservoir. The second method is the so-called model-based inversion (MBI) algorithm, which uses a priori information on the geometry to reduce the number of unknown parameters and to improve the quality of the reconstructed conductivity image. This MBI approach can also be used to refine the conductivity image obtained using the PBI approach. The MBI also adopts the multiplicative regularized Gauss–Newton method. The unknown parameters that govern the location and the shape of an anomaly are the locations of the user-defined nodes for the boundaries of the probed region, whereas the unknown parameter that describes the physical property is the conductivity. We will show some inversion results of synthetic and field data to demonstrate the advantages of both the PBI and MBI approaches. We further demonstrate that by combining both inversion algorithms we can arrive at a better interpretation of both CSEM and MT data.

A robust approach to estimation of magnetization direction from interpretation of magnetic field data

Two-dimensional Magnetotelluric Modelling by the Boundary Element Method.

Simultaneous estimation of total magnetization direction and 3-D spatial orientation

Nonlinear Formulation of the Magnetic Field to Source Relationship for Robust Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Separation of magnetic anomalies into induced and remanent magnetization contributions

A new search method to solve the magnetoencephalography inverse problem

Effects of Reconstructed Magnetic Field from Sparse Noisy Boundary Measurements on Localization of Active Neural Source

Susceptibility and remanent magnetization inversion of magnetic data with a priori information of the Köenigsberger ratio

Determination of the magnetization direction via correlation between reduced‐to‐the‐pole magnetic anomalies and total gradient of the magnetic potential with vertical magnetization

ESTIMATION OF THE DIRECTION OF MAGNETIZATION OF A BODY CAUSING A MAGNETIC ANOMALY USING A PSEUDO‐GRAVITY TRANSFORMATION

A Method Based on Measured Boundary Conditions for Reconstructing the Magnetic Field Distribution of an Electromagnetic Mechatronic System

High-precision magnetization vector inversion: application to magnetic data in the presence of significant remanent magnetization

Inversion Algorithms for Large-Scale Geophysical Electromagnetic Measurements

2.5D magnetization vector inversion of vector magnetic data

Can Targeted Source Information be Extracted from Superimposed Magnetic Anomalies?

Iterative magnetic forward modeling for high susceptibility based on integral equation and Gauss-fast Fourier transform

An efficient three-dimensional (3D) inversion algorithm for recovering magnetic targets when remanence exists

Imaging multiple magnetized anomalies by geomagnetic monitoring

An Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers Algorithm for 1-D Magnetotelluric Anisotropic Inversion Using Fourier Series Expansion

PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) for Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies Caused by Simple Geometrical Structures

Full Vector Inversion of Magnetic Microscopy Images Using Euler Deconvolution as Prior Information