RE‐START: Exploring the effectiveness of anti‐calcitonin gene‐related peptide resumption after discontinuation in migraine

Celia Romero del Rincón,Alicia Gonzalez‐Martinez,Sonia Quintas,David García‐Azorín,Iris Fernández Lázaro,Angel Luis Guerrero‐Peral,Yesica Gonzalez Osorio,Sonia Santos‐Lasaosa,Carmen González Oria,Norberto Sánchez Rodríguez,Fernando Iglesias Díez,Ana Echavarría Íñiguez,Sendoa Gil Luque,Mariano Huerta‐Villanueva,Sergio Campoy Díaz,Albert Muñoz‐Vendrell,Alberto Lozano Ros,Antonio Sánchez‐Soblechero,Fernando Velasco Juanes,Izaro Kortazar‐Zubizarreta,Amaya Echeverría,Jaime Rodríguez‐Vico,Alex Jaimes Sánchez,Andrea Gómez García,Noemí Morollón Sánchez‐Mateos,Robert Belvis,María Pilar Navarro Pérez,Juan Carlos García‐Moncó,María Rocío Álvarez Escudero,Nuria Montes,Ana Beatriz Gago‐Veiga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16203
2024-01-27
European Journal of Neurology
Abstract:Background and purpose According to the latest European guidelines, discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene‐related peptide (anti‐CGRP MAb) may be considered after 12–18 months of treatment. However, some patients may worsen after discontinuation. In this study, we assessed the response following treatment resumption. Methods This was a prospective study conducted in 14 Headache Units in Spain. We included patients with response to anti‐CGRP MAb with clinical worsening after withdrawal and resumption of treatment. Numbers of monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly headache days (MHD) were obtained at four time points: before starting anti‐CGRP MAb (T‐baseline); last month of first treatment period (T‐suspension); month of restart due to worsening (T‐worsening); and 3 months after resumption (T‐reintroduction). The response rate to resumption was calculated. Possible differences among periods were analysed according to MMD and MHD. Results A total of 360 patients, 82% women, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at migraine onset of 18 (12) years. The median (IQR) MHD at T‐baseline was 20 (13) and MMD was 5 (6); at T‐suspension, the median (IQR) MHD was 5 (6) and MMD was 4 (5); at T‐worsening, the median (IQR) MHD was 16 (13) and MMD was 12 (6); and at T‐reintroduction, the median (IQR) MHD was 8 (8) and MHD was 5 (5). In the second period of treatment, a 50% response rate was achieved by 57.4% of patients in MHD and 65.8% in MMD. Multivariate models showed significant differences in MHD between the third month after reintroduction and last month before suspension of first treatment period (p
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?