Retrospective Observational Study on 209 Patients

Vittorio Schweiger,Paola Bellamoli,Francesco Taus,Leonardo Gottin,Alvise Martini,Marta Nizzero,Eleonora Bonora,Giovanna Del Balzo,Katia Donadello,Erica Secchettin,Gabriele Finco,Daniele De Santis,Enrico Polati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041130
IF: 3.9
2024-02-17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by attacks of head pain with prevalent unilateral localization, moderate to high intensity and specifically associated accompanying symptoms. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data regarding 209 patients who had previously been diagnosed with migraine and who were prescribed, between 2019 and 2022, subcutaneous injections of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) fremanezumab or galcanezumab or anti-CGRP receptors mAb erenumab regardless of the concomitant assumption of any other acute-phase or prophylactic migraine medication. Results: Regarding efficacy, in the 205 analyzed patients, the change from baseline in terms of MIDAS, HIT-6, MMDs and MAD scores was statistically significant for erenumab and galcanezumab, while for fremanezumab a statistical significance was not achieved likely due to the small sample size. In the treated population, 36 patients (17.5%) reported AEs (pain during injection, transient injection site erythema, nausea, constipation and fatigue). Only 5 patients (2.4%) discontinued the treatment for AEs while 15 patients (7.3%) left for lack of efficacy. Conclusions: this retrospective study comes out in favor of both significant efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptors mAbs in migraine patients. Further methodologically stronger studies are necessary to validate our observation.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?