Abstract:Background: The United Kingdom (UK) is experiencing a general practitioner (GP) workforce retention crisis. Research has focused on investigating why GPs intend to quit, but less is known about the acceptability and effectiveness of policies and strategies to improve GP retention. Using evidence from research and key stakeholder organisations, we generated a set of potential policies and strategies aimed at maximising GP retention and tested their appropriateness for implementation by systematically consulting with GPs. Methods: 28 GP Partners and GPs working in national stakeholder organisations from South West England and London were purposively sampled, and asked to take part in a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method panel. Panellists were asked to read an evidence briefing summary, and then complete an online survey on two occasions. During each round, participants rated the appropriateness of policies and strategies aimed at improving GP retention using a nine point scale (1 'extremely inappropriate' to 9 'extremely appropriate'). Fifty-four potential policies and strategies (equating to 100 statements) were tested, focusing on factors influencing job satisfaction (e.g. well-being, workload, incentives and remuneration, flexible working, human resources systems). Ratings were analysed for panel consensus and categorised based on appropriateness ('appropriate', 'uncertain', 'inappropriate'). Results: 12/28 GPs approached agreed to take part, 9/28 completed two rounds of the online survey between February and June 2018. Panellists identified 24/54 policy and strategy areas (41/100 statements) as 'appropriate'. Examples included providing GP practices 'at risk' of experiencing GP shortages with a toolkit for managing recruitment and retention, and interventions to facilitate peer support to enhance health and wellbeing, or support portfolio careers. Strategies to limit GP workload, and manage patient demand were also endorsed. Conclusions: The panel of experienced GPs identified a number of practical ways to improve GP retention through interventions that might enhance job satisfaction and work-life balance. Future research should evaluate the impact of implementing these recommendations.

GP redundancies: sending the wrong message

Helen Salisbury: New doesn't mean better

Amidst a GP workforce crisis, where did all the jobs go?

Helen Salisbury: Funding GPs through the additional roles scheme won't solve GP unemployment

NHS England cuts national GP retention schemes in favour of local "support"

Give GPs their old jobs back

When is a GP not a GP? The 'othering' of new GP roles

The expansion of physician associates in primary care risks alienating an already ailing GP workforce

"PA mess" is a combination of self-interest and protectionism

Physician associates and RCGP policy — some plain speaking

GP workload and patient safety

Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study

General practitioner workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review protocol

GP training in affluent practices in Scotland: the experiences of GP trainees and implications for their future practice

GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances?

GP working time and supply, and patient demand in England in 2015-2022: a retrospective study

Single-handed versus multiple-handed General practices: A cross-sectional study of quality outcomes in England

GP practices at risk from suspension of Scottish support scheme

GPs are being overwhelmed with housing and benefits requests, doctors warn

How to address the inverse care law and increase GP recruitment in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study of GP trainees' views and experiences in the UK

Continuity of care in general practice: avoid the blunt sledgehammers of national policy